Decoupling Analysis of Four Selected Countries: China, Russia, Japan, and the United States during 2000-2007

被引:58
作者
Wang, Heming [1 ]
Hashimoto, Seiji [2 ]
Yue, Qiang [1 ]
Moriguchi, Yuichi [3 ]
Lu, Zhongwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Ritsumeikan Univ, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
economic growth; energy use; gross domestic product (GDP); industrial ecology; resource extraction; sulfur dioxide (SO2); MATERIAL FLOW; RESOURCE USE; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We examine decoupling conditions of domestic extraction of materials, energy use, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from gross domestic product (GDP) for two BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries (i.e., China and Russia) and two Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (Japan and the United States) during 2000-2007, using a pair of decoupling indicators for resource use (D-r) and waste emissions (D-e) and the decoupling chart, which can distinguish between absolute decoupling, relative decoupling, and non-decoupling. We find that (1) during 2000-2007, decoupling between environmental indicators and GDP was higher in the two OECD countries as compared with the two BRIC countries. The key reason is that these countries were in different development stages with different economic growth rates. (2) Changes in environmental policies can significantly influence the degree of decoupling in a country. (3) China, Japan, and the United States were more successful in decoupling SO2 emissions from GDP than in decoupling material and energy use from GDP. The main reason is that, unlike resource use, waste emissions (e. g., SO2 emissions) can be reduced by effective end-of-pipe treatment. (4) The decoupling indicator is different from the changing rate of resource use and waste emissions. If two countries have different GDP growth rates, even though they may have similar values using the decoupling indicator, they may show different rates of change for resource use and waste emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 629
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EC WID MAT FLOW ACC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORLD DEV IND, DOI DOI 10.HTTP://DATA.W0RLDBANK.0RG/SITES/DEFAULT/FILES/WDI-FINAL.PDF
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth
[5]  
Azar C., 2002, Decoupling-past trends and prospects for the future
[6]   The material basis of the global economy Worldwide patterns of natural resource extraction and their implications for sustainable resource use policies [J].
Behrens, Arno ;
Giljum, Stefan ;
Kovanda, Jan ;
Niza, Samuel .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) :444-453
[7]  
BP, 2010, STAT REV
[8]  
Commoner B., 1972, POPULATION RESOURCES, P339
[9]   Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions [J].
Dietz, T ;
Rosa, EA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (01) :175-179
[10]  
EHRLICH PR, 1972, SCI PUBLIC AFF, V28, P16