Modeling the Influence of the A118G Polymorphism in the OPRM1 Gene and of Noxious Stimulation on the Synergistic Relation between Propofol and Remifentanil Sedation and Analgesia in Endoscopic Procedures

被引:17
作者
Borrat, Xavier [1 ]
Troconiz, Inaki F. [1 ]
Valencia, Jose F. [1 ]
Rivadulla, Silvia [1 ]
Sendino, Oriol [1 ]
Llach, Josep [1 ]
Munoz, Jenifer [1 ]
Castellvi-Bel, Sergi [1 ]
Jospin, Mathieu [1 ]
Jensen, Erik W. [1 ]
Castells, Antoni [1 ]
Gambus, Pedro L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Syst Pharmacol Effect Control & Modeling Res Grp, Dept Anesthesia, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
OPIOID RECEPTOR GENE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; PHARMACODYNAMIC INTERACTION; APPROXIMATE ENTROPY; HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS; MORPHINE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANESTHESIA; PAIN; MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828e1544
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The presence of the A118G single nucleotide polymorphism in the OPRM1 gene as well as noxious stimulation might affect the requirements of remifentanil for patients undergoing ultrasonographic endoscopy under sedation-analgesia with propofol and remifentanil. Bispectral index (BIS) was used as a surrogate measure of effect. Methods: A total of 207 patients were screened for A118G and randomly received different combinations of propofol and remifentanil, changed depending on the nausea response to endoscopy tube introduction. Nonlinear mixed effects modelling was used to establish the relation between propofol and remifentanil with respect to BIS and to investigate the influence of A118G or noxious stimulation. The value of k(e0) for propofol and remifentanil was estimated to avoid the hysteresis between predicted effect site concentration (Ce) and BIS. Results: Data from 176 patients were analysed. Eleven were recessive homozygous for A118G (OPRM = 1). A total of 165 patients were either dominant homozygous or heterozygous and considered normal (OPRM = 0). The estimated values of k(e0) for propofol and remifentanil were 0.122 and 0.148 min(-1). Propofol and remifentanil were synergistic with respect to the BIS (alpha = 1.85). EC50 estimate for propofol was 3.86 mu g/ml and for remifentanil 19.6 ng/ml in normal patients and 326 ng/ml in OPRM = 1 patients. BIS increases around 4% for the same effect site concentrations with noxious stimulation. Conclusions: Predicted effect site concentration of remifentanil ranging 1-5 ng/ ml synergistically potentiates the effects of propofol on the BIS but has no effect in A118G patients. Noxious stimulation increases BIS values by 4% at the same concentrations of propofol and remifentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1407
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] Beal SL., 2006, NONMEM users guides
  • [3] A two-compartment effect site model describes the bispectral index after different rates of propofol infusion
    Bjornsson, Marcus A.
    Norberg, Ake
    Kalman, Sigridur
    Karlsson, Mats O.
    Simonsson, Ulrika S. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2010, 37 (03) : 243 - 255
  • [4] Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters β-endorphin binding and activity:: Possible implications for opiate addiction
    Bond, C
    LaForge, KS
    Tian, MT
    Melia, D
    Zhang, SW
    Borg, L
    Gong, JH
    Schluger, J
    Strong, JA
    Leal, SM
    Tischfield, JA
    Kreek, MJ
    Yu, L
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (16) : 9608 - 9613
  • [5] Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy
    Bouillon, TW
    Bruhn, J
    Radulescu, L
    Andresen, C
    Shafer, TJ
    Cohane, C
    Shafer, SL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (06) : 1353 - 1372
  • [6] Correlation of approximate entropy, bispectral index, and spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) with clinical signs of "anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil
    Bruhn, J
    Bouillon, TW
    Radulescu, L
    Hoeft, A
    Bertaccini, E
    Shafer, SL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (03) : 621 - 627
  • [7] Human opioid receptor A118G polymorphlism affects intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption after total abdominal hysterectomy
    Chou, Wen-Ying
    Wang, Cheng-Haung
    Liu, Ping-Hsin
    Liu, Chien-Cheng
    Tseng, Chia-Chih
    Jawan, Bruno
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (02) : 334 - 337
  • [8] Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models
    Coppens, M.
    Van Limmen, J. G. M.
    Schnider, T.
    Wyler, B.
    Bonte, S.
    Dewaele, F.
    Struys, M. M. R. F.
    Vereecke, H. E. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (04) : 452 - 458
  • [9] An Evaluation of Using Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Estimate Pharmacodynamic Parameters for Propofol and Bispectral Index in Children
    Coppens, Marc J.
    Eleveld, Douglas J.
    Proost, Johannes H.
    Marks, Luc A. M.
    Van Bocxlaer, Jan F. P.
    Vereecke, Hugo
    Absalom, Anthony R.
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 115 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [10] STAIRCASE BIOASSAY - THE UP-AND-DOWN METHOD
    DIXON, WJ
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1991, 15 (01) : 47 - 50