Prize-winning papers from the World Federation of Chiropractic 6th Biennial Congress -: First prize -: Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation:: A Transcranial magnetic stimulation study

被引:0
作者
Dishman, JD
Ball, KA
Burke, J
机构
[1] Dept Anat, Seneca Falls, NY 13148 USA
[2] New York Chiropract Coll, Dept Res, Seneca Falls, NY USA
关键词
chiropractic; transcranial magnetic stimulation; electromyography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The physiologic mechanism by which spinal manipulation may reduce pain and muscular spasm is not fully understood. One such mechanistic theory proposed is that spinal manipulation may intervene in the cycle of pain and spasm by affecting the resting excitability of the motoneuron pool in the spinal cord. Previous data from our laboratory indicate that spinal manipulation leads to attenuation of the excitability of the motor neuron pool when assessed by means of peripheral nerve la-afferent stimulation (Hoffmann reflex). Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of lumbar spinal manipulation on the excitability of the motor neuron pool as assessed by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Methods: Motor-evoked potentials were recorded subsequent to transcranial magnetic stimulation. The motor-evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitudes in the right gastrocnemius muscle of healthy voulunteers (n = 24) were measured before and after homolateral L5-S1 spinal manipulation (experimental group) or side-posture positioning with no manipulative thrust applied (control group). Immediately after the group-specific procedure, and again at 5 and 10 minutes after the procedure, 10 motor-evoked potential responses were measured at a rate of 0.05 Hz. An optical tracking system (OptoTRAK, Northern Digital Inc, Waterloo, Canada [<0.10 mm root-mean-square]) was used to monitor the 3-dimensional (3-D) position and orientation of transcranial magnetic stimulation coil, in real time, for each trial. Results: The amplitudes of the motor-evoked potentials were significantly facilitated from 20 to 60 seconds relative to the prebaseline value after L5-S1 spinal manipulation, without a concomitant change after the positioning (control) procedure. Conclusions: When motor neuron pool excitability is measured directly by central corticospinal. activation with transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques, a transient but significant facilitation occurs as a consequence of spinal manipulation. Thus, a basic neurophysiologic response to spinal manipulation is central motor facilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abbruzzese M, 1998, MUSCLE NERVE, V21, P439, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199804)21:4<439::AID-MUS2>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-A
[3]   FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
CRACCO, RQ ;
MACCABEE, PJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :401-416
[4]   CONTROL OF TONIC VIBRATION REFLEX BY BRAIN-STEM RETICULAR-FORMATION IN CAT [J].
ANDREWS, C ;
KNOWLES, L ;
HANCOCK, J .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1973, 18 (02) :217-226
[5]   CORTICORETICULOSPINAL CONTROL OF TONIC VIBRATION REFLEX IN CAT [J].
ANDREWS, C ;
KNOWLES, L ;
LANCE, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1973, 18 (02) :207-216
[6]  
ASHBY P, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V69, P1
[7]   Presynaptic inhibition and homosynaptic depression -: A comparison between lower and upper limbs in normal human subjects and patients with hemiplegia [J].
Aymard, C ;
Katz, R ;
Lafitte, C ;
Lo, E ;
Pénicaud, A ;
Pradat-Diehl, P ;
Raoul, S .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :1688-1702
[8]   Classification of errors in locating a rigid body [J].
Ball, KA ;
Pierrynowski, MR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (09) :1213-1217
[9]  
BRADDOM RI, 1974, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V55, P161
[10]   TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
BRASILNETO, JP ;
MCSHANE, LM ;
FUHR, P ;
HALLETT, M ;
COHEN, LG .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01) :9-16