Anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism patients with renal dysfunction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Fan, Guohui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Dingyi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Meng [5 ]
Luo, Xufei [6 ]
Zhai, Zhenguo [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
Wu, Sinan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Clin Res & Data Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Resp Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Resp Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinses Acad Med Sci, Inst Resp Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[7] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
anticoagulant agents; efficacy and safety; venous thromboembolism; renal insufficiency; network meta-analysis; ACUTE PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; EXTENDED TREATMENT; ORAL RIVAROXABAN; HIGH-RISK; THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS; IMPAIRMENT; APIXABAN; WARFARIN; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.979911
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety for particular regimen and dosage in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients with renal insufficiency.Methods: English language searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (inception to May 2021). RCTs evaluating anticoagulants for VTE treatment at acute phase, extension phase, and VTE prophylaxis in patients with renal insufficiency and reporting efficacy (death, recurrence, or occurrence of VTE) and safety (bleeding) outcomes were selected. The methodological quality of each study included was assessed at the outcome level using the risk-of-bias assessment tool developed by the Cochrane Bias Methods Group.Results: Twenty-one trials that involved 76,574 participants and 8,972 (11.7%) patients with renal insufficiency were enrolled, including 10 trials on VTE treatment in acute phase (3-12 months), four trials on VTE treatment in extension phase (6-36 months), and seven trials for VTE prophylaxis. For acute VTE treatment, compared with dabigatran etexilate, apixaban (RR 5.90, 95%CI 1.00-34.60) and rivaroxaban (RR 6.18, 95%CI 1.17-32.75) were significantly associated with increased risk of death or recurrence. For extension treatment of VTE, aspirin had the highest probability of the most effective and safest treatment, followed by apixaban. For VTE prophylaxis, compared with enoxaparin, desirudin was associated with lower risk of VTE occurrence (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.91), but had higher risk of bleeding than dabigatran etexilate.Conclusion: The network meta-analysis informs the optimal choice of anticoagulants and their particular dosage for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE patients comorbid renal insufficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically ill patients: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
    Al Yami, Majed S.
    Silva, Matthew A.
    Donovan, Jennifer L.
    Kanaan, Abir O.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2018, 45 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [22] Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies for People Undergoing Elective Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Lewis, Sedina
    Glen, Jessica
    Dawoud, Dalia
    Dias, Sofia
    Cobb, Jill
    Griffin, Xavier
    Reed, Michael
    Sharpin, Carlos
    Stansby, Gerard
    Barry, Peter
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (08) : 953 - 969
  • [23] Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Faizan
    Rahman, Alvi
    Carrier, Marc
    Kearon, Clive
    Weitz, Jeffrey I.
    Schulman, Sam
    Couturaud, Francis
    Eichinger, Sabine
    Kyrle, Paul A.
    Becattini, Cecilia
    Agnelli, Giancarlo
    Brighton, Timothy A.
    Lensing, Anthonie W. A.
    Prins, Martin H.
    Sabri, Elham
    Hutton, Brian
    Pinede, Laurent
    Cushman, Mary
    Palareti, Gualtiero
    Wells, George A.
    Prandoni, Paolo
    Buller, Harry R.
    Rodger, Marc A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 366
  • [24] Prophylaxis and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients A Review
    Ansell, Jack E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (04): : S8 - S12
  • [25] Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Ming-Yee
    Bhaskar, Sonu M. M.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [26] Risk of intracranial hemorrhage associated with therapeutic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rojas-Hernandez, Cristhiam M.
    Oo, Thein Hlaing
    Andres Garcia-Perdomo, Herney
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2017, 43 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [27] Association between thyroid dysfunction and venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yunmeng
    Ding, Chaowei
    Guo, Chang
    Wang, Jingru
    Liu, Suyun
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (11) : E33301
  • [28] Anticoagulation for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Hunter, Bradley D.
    Minichiello, Tracy
    Bent, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2017, 44 (03) : 392 - 398
  • [29] Anticoagulation for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with brain metastases: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Bradley D. Hunter
    Tracy Minichiello
    Stephen Bent
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2017, 44 : 392 - 398
  • [30] Effectiveness and safety of betrixaban extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism compared with standard-duration prophylaxis intervention in acute medically ill patients: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis
    Laskier, Vicki
    Guy, Holly
    Fisher, Mark
    Neuman, W. Richey
    Bucior, Iwona
    Cohen, Alexander T.
    Ren, Shijie
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 22 (10) : 1063 - 1072