Reassessing the financial and social costs of public transport

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Xucheng [1 ]
Preston, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Environm, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Environm, Civil Maritime & Environm Engn & Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
economics & finance; social impact; transport planning;
D O I
10.1680/tran.12.00096
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Increasing urbanisation around the world has raised the passenger demand for public transport. Many public transport technologies are available to meet this demand. This paper develops a spreadsheet cost model that simulates public transport modes operated on a 12-km route and incorporates a new public transport mode, the straddle bus. Previous research has assumed that demand is exogenous (externally fixed). This work investigates the impact of endogenous demand, which varies with service level characteristics. Elasticities for passenger waiting time and in-vehicle time are used to assess actual passenger reactions to the attractiveness for different public transport technologies at different levels of demand. The result of this work shows the lowest average social and operator cost public transport technologies for different ranges of demand. Based on the default values used in the spreadsheet model, smaller size vehicles (e.g. personal rapid transit and minibus) dominate the low passenger demand range due to their short waiting times. Single-decker and double-decker buses appear to be the best option for a demand of around 3000-60 000 passengers per day (ppd), followed by the straddle bus (from around 60 000 to 100 000 ppd). The great capacity but high capital costs of underground make it the most cost-effective technology when other technologies are experiencing high congestion, with demand levels higher than 100 000 ppd.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 369
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Will Covid-19 put the public back in public transport? A UK perspective
    Vickerman, Roger
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2021, 103 : 95 - 102
  • [22] Investigating social sustainability in public housing
    Abed, Amal
    Alzghoul, Ola
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2023, 176 (03) : 106 - 122
  • [23] Defining the social value of transport infrastructure
    Kalyviotis, Nikolaos
    Rogers, Christopher D. F.
    Tight, Miles R.
    Hewings, Geoffrey J. D.
    Doloi, Hemanta
    INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2020, 7 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [24] The quality of public transport as a determinant of the number of car commuters
    Karu, K.
    Roivas, T.
    Antov, D.
    Oja, T.
    Mander, U.
    URBAN TRANSPORT XIII: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2007, 96 : 13 - 22
  • [25] An Index to Evaluate Public Policies in Urban Freight Transport
    Betanzo-Quezada, Eduardo
    Romero-Navarrete, Jose A.
    Obregon-Biosca, Saul
    GESTION Y POLITICA PUBLICA, 2013, 22 (02): : 313 - 354
  • [26] Pandemic insights: analyzing public transport with logit models
    Rizelioglu, Mehmet
    Demir, Serife Gulsum
    Arslan, Turan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2024, 177 (06) : 343 - 357
  • [27] A methodology for measuring a local index of public transport accessibility
    Al-Sahili, Khaled
    Qaisi, Khalil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-TRANSPORT, 2021, 176 (06) : 337 - 348
  • [28] Local public transport planning in Poland - geographical input
    Chaberko, Tomasz
    Kretowicz, Pawel
    BULLETIN OF GEOGRAPHY-SOCIO-ECONOMIC SERIES, 2014, 23 (23) : 7 - 24
  • [29] Geographical input to local public transport planning in Poland
    Chaberko, Tomasz
    Kretowicz, Pawel
    BULLETIN OF GEOGRAPHY-SOCIO-ECONOMIC SERIES, 2013, 22 (22) : 35 - 46
  • [30] Public transport reliability across preferences, modes, and space
    Soza-Parra, Jaime
    Raveau, Sebastian
    Munoz, Juan Carlos
    TRANSPORTATION, 2022, 49 (02) : 621 - 640