Analytical model for solar PV and CSP electricity costs: Present LCOE values and their future evolution

被引:302
作者
Hernandez-Moro, J. [1 ]
Martinez-Duart, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Appl Phys Dept C 12, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
关键词
LCOE; Concentrating solar power; Photovoltaic; Grid parities; Solar electricity costs; Renewable energy economics; POWER CSP; EXPERIENCE CURVES; LEVELIZED COST; LEARNING-CURVE; ENERGY; PHOTOVOLTAICS; TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS; PLANTS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.082
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper we first make a review of the past annual production of electricity and the cumulative installed capacity for photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies. This together with the annual costs of PV modules and CSP systems allows us the determination of the experience curves and the corresponding learning rates. Then, we go over a rigorous exposition of the methodology employed for the calculation of the value of the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for PV and CSP. Based on this knowledge, we proceed to establish a mathematical model which yields closed-form analytical expressions for the present value of the LCOE, as well as its future evolution (2010-2050) based on the International Energy Agency roadmaps for the cumulative installed capacity. Next, we explain in detail how specific values are assigned to the twelve independent variables which enter the LCOE formula: solar resource, discount and learning rates, initial cost and lifetime of the system, operational and maintenance costs, etc. With all this background, and making use of a simple computer simulation program, we can generate the following: sensitivity analysis curves, graphs on the evolution of the LCOE in the period 2010-2050, and calculations of the years at which grid parities will be reached. These representations prove to be very useful in energy planning policies, like tariff-in schemes, tax exemptions, etc., and in making investment decisions, since they allow, for a given location, to directly compare the costs of PV vs CSP power generation technologies for the period 2010-2050. Among solar technologies, PV seems always more appropriate for areas located in middle to high latitudes of the Earth, while CSP systems, preferably with thermal storage incorporated, yield their best performance in arid areas located at relatively low latitudes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 132
页数:14
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [41] Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Fundamental concepts and novel materials
    Gong, Jiawei
    Liang, Jing
    Sumathy, K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (08) : 5848 - 5860
  • [42] Greenpeace International European Photovoltaic Industry Association (EPIA), 2011, SOL GEN, P6
  • [43] Greenpeace International SolarPACES European Solar Thermal Electricity Association (ESTELA), 2009, GLOB OUTL 2009
  • [44] Dynamics of energy technologies and global change
    Grübler, A
    Nakicenovic, N
    Victor, DG
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (05) : 247 - 280
  • [45] Guillemoles J. F., 2011, Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, P238
  • [46] Hearps PatrickMcConnell., 2011, Renewable Energy Technology Cost Review
  • [47] CSP electricity cost evolution and grid parities based on the IEA roadmaps
    Hernandez-Moro, J.
    Martinez-Duart, J. M.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 41 : 184 - 192
  • [48] Hoffmann W., 2010, PV SOLAR ELECT EUMEN
  • [49] IEA, 2000, EN POL IEA COUNTR NE, P1
  • [50] Inflationdata.com, 2012, HIST INFL