Comprehensive overview of computer-based health information tailoring: a scoping review protocol

被引:12
作者
Ghalibaf, Azadeh Kamel [1 ]
Nazari, Elham [1 ]
Gholian-Aval, Mahdi [2 ]
Tabesh, Hamed [3 ]
Tara, Mahmood [3 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Med Informat, Students Res Comm, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Hlth Educ & Hlth Promot, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Med Informat, Mashhad, Iran
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
health informatics; information technology;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019215
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Tailoring health information to the needs of individuals has become an important part of modern health communications. Tailoring has been addressed by researchers from different disciplines leading to the emergence of a wide range of approaches, making the newcomers confused. In order to address this, a comprehensive overview of the field with the indications of research gaps, tendencies and trends will be helpful. As a result, a systematic protocol was outlined to conduct a scoping review within the field of computer-based health information tailoring. Methods and analysis This protocol is based on the York's five-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. A field-specific structure was defined as a basis for undertaking each stage. The structure comprised three main aspects: system design, information communication and evaluation. Five leading databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, EBSCO and IEEE and a broad search strategy was used with less strict inclusion criteria to cover the breadth of evidence. Theoretical frameworks were used to develop the data extraction form and a rigorous approach was introduced to identify the categories from data. Several explanatory-descriptive methods were considered to analyse the data, from which some were proposed to be employed for the first time in scoping studies. Ethics and dissemination This study investigates the breadth and depth of existing literature on computer-tailoring and as a secondary analysis, does not require ethics approval. We anticipate that the results will identify research gaps and novel ideas for future studies and provide direction to combine methods from different disciplines. The research findings will be submitted for publication to relevant peer-reviewed journals and conferences targeting health promotion and patient education.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self Study Guide
  • [2] Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Archambault, Patrick Michel
    van de Belt, Tom H.
    Grajales, Francisco J., III
    Eysenbach, Gunther
    Aubin, Karine
    Gold, Irving
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Kuziemsky, Craig E.
    Turgeon, Alexis F.
    Poitras, Julien
    Faber, Marjan J.
    Kremer, Jan A. M.
    Heldoorn, Marcel
    Bilodeau, Andrea
    Legare, France
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2012, 1 (01):
  • [3] Arksey H, 2005, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [4] A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Computer-Tailored Physical Activity and Dietary Behavior Promotion Programs: an Update
    Broekhuizen, Karen
    Kroeze, Willemieke
    van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
    Oenema, Anke
    Brug, Johannes
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2012, 44 (02) : 259 - 286
  • [5] The development of computer-generated tailored interventions
    Dijkstra, A
    De Vries, H
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 36 (02) : 193 - 203
  • [6] Dijkstra A., 2016, PERSONALIZATION COMP
  • [7] A scoping review protocol to map the research foci trends in tobacco control over the last decade
    Halas, Gayle
    Schultz, Annette S. H.
    Rothney, Janet
    Goertzen, Leah
    Wener, Pamela
    Katz, Alan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (01):
  • [8] Reporting standards for studies of tailored interventions
    Harrington, Nancy Grant
    Noar, Seth M.
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2012, 27 (02) : 331 - 342
  • [9] What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review
    Kastner, Monika
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Soobiah, Charlene
    Lillie, Erin
    Perrier, Laure
    Horsley, Tanya
    Welch, Vivian
    Cogo, Elise
    Antony, Jesmin
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [10] Kreuter M.W., 2013, Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology