Why do newly diagnosed breast cancer patients seek a second opinion? - Second opinion seeking and its association with the physician-patient relationship

被引:15
作者
Cecon, Natalia [1 ,2 ]
Hillen, Marij A. [3 ]
Pfaff, Holger [1 ,2 ]
Dresen, Antje [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Sophie E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Inst Med Sociol Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci, Fac Human Sci, Eupener Str 129, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Eupener Str 129, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Second opinion; Breast cancer; Physician-patient relationship; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; QUESTIONNAIRE; CARE; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.017
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine breast cancer patients' reasons to seek a second opinion (SO) and the underlying variables. To find out more about the outcome of the SO, the perceived helpfulness and the effect on the physician-patient relationship. Methods: In 2017, 4626 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from 86 hospitals in Germany completed a postoperative mail survey (response rate = 89.04%). Data from 419 SO-seeking patients was obtained and analyzed by conducting logistic regression and non-parametric group comparisons. Results: Reasons to seek an SO were mostly unrelated to the physician-patient relationship. Reasons related to the physician-patient-relationship were associated with a lower education level. The SO mostly (72.2%) equaled the first opinion. A different treatment plan recommendation (25%) reportedly affected the patients' relationship with their primary physician. Patients who received a different diagnosis reported more fear of progression. Most patients found the SO helpful. Conclusion: The reasons to seek an SO are primarily unrelated to the physician-patient relationship. However, less educated patients seem to have different reasons to seek an SO. These reasons were reportedly associated with the physician-patient relationship. Practice implications: Physicians may need to explicitly ascertain the patient's needs within the physician-patient communication to avoid inequalities based on patient education. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1004
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HLTH LIT INT OUTC UP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EUROPEAN HLTH LITERA
[3]  
Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe, VERF ZERT BRUSTZ NRW
[4]   Results of the Lynn sage second-opinion program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma - Changes in management and determinants of where care is delivered [J].
Clauson, J ;
Hsieh, YC ;
Acharya, S ;
Rademaker, AW ;
Morrow, M .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (04) :889-894
[5]  
Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, QUAL ENTSCH DIAGN TH
[6]  
Ernstmann N, 2017, Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q, V121, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.12.008
[7]   Satisfaction with information and unmet information needs in men and women with cancer [J].
Faller, Hermann ;
Koch, Uwe ;
Braehler, Elmar ;
Haerter, Martin ;
Keller, Monika ;
Schulz, Holger ;
Wegscheider, Karl ;
Weis, Joachim ;
Boehncke, Anna ;
Hund, Bianca ;
Reuter, Katrin ;
Richard, Matthias ;
Sehner, Susanne ;
Szalai, Carina ;
Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich ;
Mehnert, Anja .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2016, 10 (01) :62-70
[8]   Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation [J].
Goldman, Roberta E. ;
Sullivan, Amy ;
Back, Anthony L. ;
Alexander, Stewart C. ;
Matsuyama, Robin K. ;
Lee, Stephanie J. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 76 (01) :44-50
[9]   Second opinion in medical encounters - A study among breast cancer patients [J].
Gross, Sophie E. ;
Hillen, Marij A. ;
Pfaff, Holger ;
Scholten, Nadine .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (11) :1990-1995
[10]   Association of Five-Factor Model Personality Domains and Facets with Presence, Onset, and Treatment Outcomes of Major Depression in Older Adults [J].
Hayward, R. David ;
Taylor, Warren D. ;
Smoski, Moria J. ;
Steffens, David C. ;
Payne, Martha E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 21 (01) :88-96