Phase 4 randomized trial of intradermal low-antigen-content inactivated influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose intramuscular vaccine in HIV-1-infected adults

被引:11
作者
Ansaldi, Filippo [1 ,2 ]
Valle, Laura [2 ]
de Florentiis, Daniela [2 ]
Parodi, Valentina [2 ]
Murdaca, Giuseppe [1 ,3 ]
Bruzzone, Bianca M. [1 ]
Durando, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Setti, Maurizio [1 ]
Icardi, Giancarlo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Martino IST, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, DiSSal, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, DIMI, Genoa, Italy
关键词
influenza vaccines; intradermal injections; safety; tolerability; immunogenicity; HIV; DENDRITIC CELLS; IMMUNE-RESPONSE; HEALTHY-ADULTS; SPLIT-VIRION; IMMUNOGENICITY; SAFETY; VIRUS; INFECTION; ROUTE;
D O I
10.4161/hv.20347
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study evaluated safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of intradermal (ID) trivalent inactivated split influenza vaccine, with a lower antigen content (9 mu g HA per strain) than the conventional intramuscular one (15 mu g), in HIV-1-infected adults younger than 60 y. A total of 54 HIV-1-positive participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either ID-administered low-antigen-content split inactivated vaccine or intramuscularly-administered (IM) standard-dose inactivated split vaccine. Subjects were provided with a diary to monitor any local and/or systemic reactions to the vaccine for 7 d following vaccination. Serum samples were collected before, 28 d and 90 d after immunization. The plasma HIV-RNA and CD4(+) T-lymphocyte count were checked at day 0 and day 90. Serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) activity for the three influenza strains included in the vaccine composition was measured to assess the antibody response at one month and 3 mo after vaccination. Both vaccines showed optimal safety and tolerability profiles. All the three Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use immunogenicity criteria for vaccine approval in adults younger than 60 were met by both vaccines against A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) viruses. Both vaccines met mean-fold-increase and seroprotection criteria but failed seroconversion criteria against B virus. No difference in terms of post-vaccination geometric mean titers, mean fold increase, seroprotection and seroconversion rates were found comparing ID and IM vaccines. In conclusion, the recently available low-antigen-content ID vaccine is safe, well-tolerated and as immunogenic as IM standard-dose influenza vaccine.
引用
收藏
页码:1048 / 1052
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MMWR, V58, P4
[2]   Immunogenicity, large scale safety and lot consistency of an intradermal influenza vaccine in adults aged 18-60 years Randomized, controlled, phase III trial [J].
Arnou, Robert ;
Eavis, Patrick ;
De Juanes Pardo, Jose-Ramon ;
Ambrozaitis, Arvydas ;
Kazek, Marie-Pierre ;
Weber, Francoise .
HUMAN VACCINES, 2010, 6 (04) :346-354
[3]   Comparative immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine administered by intradermal or intramuscular route in healthy adults [J].
Belshe, Robert B. ;
Newman, Frances K. ;
Wilkins, Ken ;
Graham, Irene L. ;
Babusis, Elizabeth ;
Ewell, Marian ;
Frey, Sharon E. .
VACCINE, 2007, 25 (37-38) :6755-6763
[4]   Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial [J].
Beran, Jiri ;
Ambrozaitis, Arvydas ;
Laiskonis, Alvydas ;
Mickuviene, Narseta ;
Bacart, Patrick ;
Calozet, Yvan ;
Demanet, Etienne ;
Heijmans, Stephane ;
Van Belle, Paul ;
Weber, Francoise ;
Salamand, Camille .
BMC MEDICINE, 2009, 7
[5]   Immune Response after Two Doses of the Novel Split Virion, Adjuvanted Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A Vaccine in HIV-1-Infected Patients [J].
Bickel, Markus ;
von Hentig, Nils ;
Wieters, Imke ;
Khaykin, Pavel ;
Nisius, Gabi ;
Haberl, Annette ;
Stephan, Christoph ;
Herrmann, Eva ;
Doerr, Hans W. ;
Brodt, Hans Reinhard ;
Allwinn, Regina .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 (01) :122-127
[6]   Immunogenicity Is Not Improved by Increased Antigen Dose or Booster Dosing of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in a Randomized Trial of HIV Infected Adults [J].
Cooper, Curtis ;
Thorne, Anona ;
Klein, Marina ;
Conway, Brian ;
Boivin, Guy ;
Haase, David ;
Shafran, Stephen ;
Zubyk, Wendy ;
Singer, Joel ;
Halperin, Scott ;
Walmsley, Sharon .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (03)
[7]   Editorial response: Influenza, influenza virus vaccine, and human immunodeficiency virus infection [J].
Couch, RB .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 28 (03) :548-551
[8]   Immunogenicity of a Monovalent 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccine in an Immunocompromised Population: A Prospective Study Comparing HIV-Infected Adults with HIV-Uninfected Adults [J].
Crum-Cianflone, Nancy F. ;
Eberly, Lynn E. ;
Duplessis, Chris ;
Maguire, Jason ;
Ganesan, Anuradha ;
Faix, Dennis ;
Defang, Gabriel ;
Bai, Yun ;
Iverson, Erik ;
Lalani, Tahaniyat ;
Whitman, Timothy ;
Blair, Patrick J. ;
Brandt, Carolyn ;
Macalino, Grace ;
Burgess, Timothy .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 (01) :138-146
[9]   Safety and immunogenicity of two influenza virus subunit vaccines, with or without MF59 adjuvant, administered to human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive and -seronegative adults [J].
Durando, P. ;
Fenoglio, D. ;
Boschini, A. ;
Ansaldi, F. ;
Icardi, G. ;
Sticchi, L. ;
Renzoni, A. ;
Fabbri, P. ;
Ferrera, A. ;
Parodi, A. ;
Bruzzone, B. ;
Gabutti, G. ;
Podda, A. ;
Del Giudice, G. ;
Fragapane, E. ;
Indiveri, F. ;
Crovari, P. ;
Gasparini, R. .
CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 15 (02) :253-259
[10]  
ECDC SIIP Team, 2008, ECDC GUID PRIOR RISK