共 50 条
A comparison of Triple I classification with neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator recommendations in neonates born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis
被引:2
作者:
Coleman, Cassandra
[1
]
Carola, David L.
[2
]
Sloane, Amy J.
[2
]
Lafferty, Margaret A.
[2
]
Roman, Amanda
[3
]
Cruz, Yury
[3
]
Solarin, Kolawole
[2
]
Aghai, Zubair H.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp Nemours, Pediat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp Nemours, Neonatol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词:
NEWBORNS;
MANAGEMENT;
RISK;
INFLAMMATION;
D O I:
10.1038/s41372-020-0727-9
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Objective To compare the early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator recommendations for infants born to mothers with clinical chorioamnionitis with those made by the Triple I classification. Study design Retrospective analysis of chorioamnionitis-exposed neonates >= 35 weeks. EOS risk was calculated with baseline risks of 0.5/1000 and 4/1000. Mothers were retrospectively categorized using the Triple I classification. Calculator recommendations were compared with the Triple I classification recommendations. Results We included 687 chorioamnionitis-exposed neonates. With a baseline risk of 0.5/1000, the calculator recommended no evaluation in 68.4% of infants of mothers with confirmed Triple I. With a baseline risk of 4/1000, 62.3% of infants of mothers with confirmed Triple I and 57.1% of infants born to mothers who did not meet fever criteria would have received evaluation. Conclusions The EOS calculator with either baseline risk does not recommend evaluation in a large number of infants born to mothers with confirmed Triple I.
引用
收藏
页码:1308 / 1314
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条