Outcomes of Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Pericardiocentesis for Pericardial Effusion

被引:84
|
作者
El Haddad, Danielle [1 ]
Iliescu, Cezar [1 ]
Yusuf, Syed Wamique [1 ]
William, William Nassib, Jr. [2 ]
Khair, Tarif H. [3 ]
Song, Juhee [4 ]
Mouhayar, Elie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Sch Houston, Dept Cardiol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
catheter drainage; prothrombin time; safety; thrombocytopenia; PLATELET TRANSFUSION; CATHETER DRAINAGE; MANAGEMENT; MALIGNANCY; GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pericardial effusion (PE) is common in cancer patients, but the optimal therapeutic approach is not well defined. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis is less invasive than surgery, but its long-term effectiveness and safety have not been well documented. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of cancer patients undergoing percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE and assess the procedure's safety in patients with thrombocytopenia. METHODS Cancer patients who underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis for PE between November 2009 and October 2014 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Procedure-related complications, effusion recurrence rate, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS Of 1,645 cancer patients referred for PE, 212 (13%) underwent percutaneous pericardiocentesis. The procedure was successful in 99% of the cases, and there were no procedure-related deaths. Four patients had major procedure-related bleeding that did not vary by platelet count < 50,000/mu l or >= 50,000/mu l (p = 0.1281). Patients with catheter drainage for 3 to 5 days had the lowest recurrence rate (10%). Median overall survival was 143 days; older age (i.e., >65 years), lung cancer, platelet count < 20,000/mu l, and malignant pericardial fluid were independently associated with poor prognosis. Lung cancer patients with proven malignant effusions had a significantly shorter median 1-year survival compared with those with nonmalignant effusions (16.2% vs. 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test p = 0.0101). A similar difference in 1-year survival was not observed in patients with breast cancer (40.2% vs. 40.0%; log-rank test p = 0.4170). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous pericardiocentesis with extended catheter drainage was safe and effective as the primary treatment for PE in cancer patients, including in those with thrombocytopenia. Malignant PE significantly shortened the survival outcome of patients with lung cancer but not those with breast cancer. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aetiological distribution and clinical features in children with large pericardial effusion who underwent pericardiocentesis
    Donbaloglu, Furkan
    Dogan, Vehbi
    Celebi, Serpil Kaya
    Beyazal, Meryem
    Sayici, Ilker U.
    Donbaloglu, Zeynep
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2025,
  • [32] Idiopathic pericardial effusion in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Puwanant, Sarinya
    Kittipibul, Veraprapas
    Songsirisuk, Nattakorn
    Santisukwongchote, Sakun
    Sitticharoenchai, Patita
    Chattranukulchai, Pairoj
    Satitthummanid, Sudarat
    Boonyaratvej, Smonporn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 38 (02) : 331 - 337
  • [33] Novel, Long-axis In-plane Ultrasound-Guided Pericardiocentesis for Postoperative Pericardial Effusion Drainage
    Law, Mark A.
    Borasino, Santiago
    Kalra, Yuvraj
    Alten, Jeffrey A.
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (07) : 1328 - 1333
  • [34] Characteristic molecular signature of pericardial effusion identifies malignant cancer in pericardial disorder patients
    Kim, Sang Yean
    Eun, Jung Woo
    Kim, Hyung Seok
    Yang, Hee Doo
    Na, Min Jeong
    Ahn, Young Min
    Jung, Hae Ok
    Nam, Suk Woo
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 16 (03) : 211 - 220
  • [35] Percutaneous Drainage of Postoperative Pericardial Effusion in Cardiac Surgery
    Jaussaud, Nicolas
    Boignard, Aude
    Durand, Michel
    Bach, Vincent
    Porcu, Paolo
    Hacini, Rachid
    Blin, Dominique
    Chavanon, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [36] Dosetaxel Induced Pericardial Effusion in Two Gastric Cancer Patients
    Yazilitas, Dogan
    Oguz, Arzu
    Colak, Dilsen
    Imamoglu, Goksen I.
    Ersoy, Ugur
    Altinbas, Mustafa
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2016, 26 (02): : 123 - 125
  • [37] Recurrence of pericardial effusion after different procedure modalities in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
    Chang, L-K
    Kuo, Y-W
    Wu, S-G
    Chung, K-P
    Shih, J-Y
    ESMO OPEN, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [38] Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sutton, Nadia R.
    Seth, Milan
    Ruwende, Cyril
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (09) : 895 - 904
  • [39] Outcomes of idiopathic chronic large pericardial effusion
    Imazio, Massimo
    Lazaros, George
    Valenti, Anna
    De Carlini, Caterina Chiara
    Maggiolini, Stefano
    Pivetta, Emanuele
    Giustetto, Carla
    Tousoulis, Dimitris
    Adler, Yehuda
    Rinaldi, Mauro
    Brucato, Antonio
    HEART, 2019, 105 (06) : 477 - 481
  • [40] Pericardiocentesis Versus Surgical Pericardiotomy for Malignant Pericardial Effusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Oliveira, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega
    Peres, Clara de Andrade Pontual
    Oliveira, Amanda Caroline
    Onyeji, Paul
    Kemczenski, Frederico
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025,