Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: Strategy development using decision analysis

被引:33
|
作者
Benitz, WE
Gould, JB
Druzin, ML
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Maternal & Child Hlth Program, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
group B streptococcus; neonatal sepsis; early-onset sepsis; prevention; decision analysis;
D O I
10.1542/peds.103.6.e76
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate recommended strategies for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal infections (EOGBS) with reference to strategies optimized using decision analysis. Methods. The EOGBS attack rate, prevalence and odds ratios for risk factors, and expected effects of prophylaxis were estimated from published data. Population subgroups were defined by gestational age, presence or absence of intrapartum fever or prolonged rupture of membranes, and presence or absence of maternal group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization. The EOGBS prevalence in each subgroup was estimated using decision analysis. The number of EOCBS cases prevented by an intervention was estimated as the product of the expected reduction in attack rate and the number of expected cases in each group selected for treatment. For each strategy, the number of residual EOGBS cases, cost, and numbers of treated patients were calculated based on the composition of the prophylaxis group. Integrated obstetrical-neonatal strategies for EOGBS prevention were developed by targeting the subgroups expected to benefit most from intervention. Results. Reductions in EOGBS rates predicted by this decision analysis were smaller than those previously estimated for the strategies proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 1992 (32.9% vs 90.7%), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in 1992 (53.8% vs 88.8%), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1996 (75.1% vs 86.0%). Strategies based on screening for GBS colonization with rectovaginal cultures at 36 weeks or on use of a rapid test to screen for GBS colonization on presentation for delivery, combining intrapartum prophylaxis for selected mothers and postpartum prophylaxis for some of their infants, would require treatment of fewer patients and prevent more cases (78.4% or 80.1%, respectively) at lower cost. Conclusions. No strategy can prevent all EOGBS cases, but the attack rate can be reduced at a cost <$12 000 per prevented case. Supplementing intrapartum prophylaxis with postpartum ampicillin in a few infants is more effective and less costly than providing intrapartum prophylaxis for more mothers. Better intrapartum screening tests offer the greatest promise for increasing efficacy. Integrated obstetrical and neonatal regimens appropriate to the population served should be adopted by each obstetrical service. Surveillance of costs, complications, and benefits will be essential to guide continued iterative improvement of these strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:COVER1 / A13
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of a strategy to prevent neonatal early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis
    Renner, RM
    Renner, A
    Schmid, S
    Hoesli, I
    Nars, P
    Holzgreve, W
    Surbek, DV
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [2] OUTBREAK OF EARLY-ONSET GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCAL SEPSIS
    ADAMS, WG
    KINNEY, JS
    SCHUCHAT, A
    COLLIER, CL
    PAPASIAN, CJ
    KILBRIDE, HW
    RIEDO, FX
    BROOME, CV
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1993, 12 (07) : 565 - 570
  • [3] Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: is there a role for rescreening near term?
    Mirsky, Rachel
    Carpenter, Diane M.
    Postlethwaite, Debbie A.
    Regenstein, Anne C.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (22) : 3791 - 3797
  • [4] Risk factors for early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: Estimation of odds ratios by critical literature review
    Benitz, WE
    Gould, JB
    Druzin, ML
    PEDIATRICS, 1999, 103 (06)
  • [5] Early-onset group B streptococcal infection after a combined maternal and neonatal group B streptococcal chemoprophylaxis strategy
    Velaphi, S
    Siegel, JD
    Wendel, GD
    Cushion, N
    Eid, WM
    Sánchez, PJ
    PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (03) : 541 - 547
  • [6] Antimicrobial prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: Estimates of risk reduction based on a critical literature review
    Benitz, WE
    Gould, JB
    Druzin, ML
    PEDIATRICS, 1999, 103 (06)
  • [7] Early Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Sepsis
    Oh, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [8] Early-onset Group B streptococcal sepsis in a preterm infant with Kostmann syndrome
    Fujiu, T
    Maruyama, K
    Koizumi, T
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2002, 91 (12) : 1397 - 1399
  • [9] Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening?
    Lee, Jiun
    Naiduvaje, Krishnamoorthy
    Chew, Ka Lip
    Charan, Natasha
    Chan, Yiong Huak
    Lin, Raymond Tzer-Pin
    Yong, Eu Leong
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 62 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [10] The Prevention of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease
    Money, Deborah
    Allen, Victoria M.
    Yudin, Mark H.
    Allen, Victoria M.
    Bouchard, Celine
    Boucher, Marc
    Caddy, Sheila
    Castillo, Eliana
    Money, Deborah
    Murphy, Kellie E.
    Ogilvie, Gina
    Paquet, Caroline
    Senikas, Vyta
    van Schalkwyk, Julie
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2013, 35 (10) : 939 - +