Predictive Factors for Residual Disease in Re-Excision Specimens After Breast-Conserving Surgery

被引:16
|
作者
Atalay, Can [1 ]
Irkkan, Cigdem [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Oncol Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Oncol Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ankara, Turkey
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2012年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
breast-conserving surgery; positive margins; re-excision specimen; residual disease; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; CONSERVATION SURGERY; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; CANCER; REEXCISION; LUMPECTOMY; THERAPY; BIOPSY; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01249.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Local recurrence is an issue of concern after breast-conserving therapy and removing the primary tumor with negative surgical margins is the most important determinant of local recurrence. However, some patients with positive margins after initial surgery will have no residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. To avoid unnecessary re-excisions, factors predicting residual disease in re-excision material should be determined. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for residual disease in the re-excision material in a homogeneous group of patients with positive margins and only invasive ductal carcinoma. Breast cancer patients treated between 2005 and 2008 with breast-conserving surgery and subsequent re-excisions due to positive surgical margins after initial surgery were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as those with and without residual disease in the re-excision material. One hundred and four breast cancer patients were included in the study. Forty-seven patients (45.2%) had residual tumor in re-excision specimen. Patient characteristics such as age (p = 0.42) and physical findings (p = 1.0) and specimen volume (p = 0.24), tumor grade (p = 0.33), estrogen (p = 1.0), and progesterone (p = 0.37) receptor status, axillary lymph node metastases (p = 0.16), extensive intraductal component (p = 0.8), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.064) were found as insignificant factors for predicting residual tumor. Large tumor size (>3 cm) (p = 0.026), human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2) positivity (p = 0.013), and tumor to specimen volume ratio of >70% (p = 0.002) significantly increased the probability of finding residual disease after re-excision. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (p = 0.046) and tumor to specimen volume ratio of >70% (p = 0.006) independently predicted the presence of residual disease. As a result, in patients with HER2 positive tumors larger than 3 cm, larger volume of breast tissue around the tumor should be removed to decrease the number of re-excisions due to positive surgical margins.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 344
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Predictive of Re-excision After Oncoplastic Breast-conserving Surgery
    Amabile, Maria-Ida
    Mazouni, Chafika
    Guimond, Cathie
    Sarfati, Benjamin
    Leymarie, Nicolas
    Cloutier, Alexis-Simon
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Garbay, Jean-Remi
    Kolb, Frederic
    Rimareix, Francoise
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (07) : 4229 - 4234
  • [2] Factors predicting residual disease on re-excision after breast conserving surgery
    Simpson, Duncan James
    Allan, Jennifer
    McFall, Brendan
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2022, 20 (04): : E149 - E157
  • [3] Factors predicting residual disease on re-excision after breast conserving surgery
    Simpson, Duncan
    Allan, Jennifer
    McFall, Brendan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [4] Margin Width Is Not Predictive of Residual Disease on Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Gusic, Lejla Hadzikadic
    McGuire, Kandace
    Ozmen, Tolga
    Thomas, Christine
    Soran, Atilla
    McAuliffe, Priscilla
    Diego, Emilia
    Bonaventura, Marguerite
    Johnson, Ronald
    Ahrendt, Gretchen
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 : 52 - 54
  • [5] Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast-conserving therapy
    O'Brien, Julie
    Morrow, Monica
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (06) : 507 - 508
  • [6] Risk Factors for Re-Excision Following Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Rodriguez, Kimberly A.
    Wilkins, Gayle G.
    Newcomb, Patricia
    Gwirtz, Patricia A.
    Skrine, Robin
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2017, 44 (03) : 358 - 365
  • [7] Assessment of Surgeon Factors Associated With Margin Re-excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Chakedis, Jeffery M.
    Chang, Sharon B.
    Tang, Annie
    Kuehner, Gillian E.
    Savitz, Alison C.
    Vuong, Brooke
    Kavanagh, Maihgan A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (08) : e2228100
  • [8] Re-Excision after Breast Conservation Surgery in Breast Cancer: Factors Associated with Residual Disease in Re-Excision
    McHugh, S.
    Tawfik, O.
    Fan, F.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 94 : 67A - 68A
  • [9] Re-Excision after Breast Conservation Surgery in Breast Cancer: Factors Associated with Residual Disease in Re-Excision
    McHugh, S.
    Tawfik, O.
    Fan, F.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 : 67A - 68A
  • [10] Factors Associated with Re-excision after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Jung, Woohyun
    Kang, Eunyoung
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Kim, Dongwon
    Hwang, Yoonsun
    Sun, Young
    Yom, Cha Kyong
    Kim, Sung-Won
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2012, 15 (04) : 412 - 419