Predictive Factors for Residual Disease in Re-Excision Specimens After Breast-Conserving Surgery

被引:16
作者
Atalay, Can [1 ]
Irkkan, Cigdem [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Oncol Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Oncol Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
breast-conserving surgery; positive margins; re-excision specimen; residual disease; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; CONSERVATION SURGERY; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; CANCER; REEXCISION; LUMPECTOMY; THERAPY; BIOPSY; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01249.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Local recurrence is an issue of concern after breast-conserving therapy and removing the primary tumor with negative surgical margins is the most important determinant of local recurrence. However, some patients with positive margins after initial surgery will have no residual tumor in the re-excision specimen. To avoid unnecessary re-excisions, factors predicting residual disease in re-excision material should be determined. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for residual disease in the re-excision material in a homogeneous group of patients with positive margins and only invasive ductal carcinoma. Breast cancer patients treated between 2005 and 2008 with breast-conserving surgery and subsequent re-excisions due to positive surgical margins after initial surgery were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as those with and without residual disease in the re-excision material. One hundred and four breast cancer patients were included in the study. Forty-seven patients (45.2%) had residual tumor in re-excision specimen. Patient characteristics such as age (p = 0.42) and physical findings (p = 1.0) and specimen volume (p = 0.24), tumor grade (p = 0.33), estrogen (p = 1.0), and progesterone (p = 0.37) receptor status, axillary lymph node metastases (p = 0.16), extensive intraductal component (p = 0.8), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.064) were found as insignificant factors for predicting residual tumor. Large tumor size (>3 cm) (p = 0.026), human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2) positivity (p = 0.013), and tumor to specimen volume ratio of >70% (p = 0.002) significantly increased the probability of finding residual disease after re-excision. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (p = 0.046) and tumor to specimen volume ratio of >70% (p = 0.006) independently predicted the presence of residual disease. As a result, in patients with HER2 positive tumors larger than 3 cm, larger volume of breast tissue around the tumor should be removed to decrease the number of re-excisions due to positive surgical margins.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 344
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer [J].
Aziz, Dalal ;
Rawlinson, Ellen ;
Narod, Steven A. ;
Sun, Ping ;
Lickley, H. Lavina A. ;
McCready, David R. ;
Holloway, Claire M. B. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (04) :331-337
[2]   Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy [J].
Bani, M. R. ;
Lux, M. P. ;
Heusinger, K. ;
Wenkel, E. ;
Magener, A. ;
Schulz-Wendtland, R. ;
Beckmann, M. W. ;
Fasching, P. A. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (01) :32-37
[3]   Attaining Negative Margins in Breast-Conservation Operations: Is There a Consensus among Breast Surgeons? [J].
Blair, Sarah L. ;
Thompson, Kari ;
Rococco, Joseph ;
Malcarne, Vanessa ;
Beitsch, Peter D. ;
Ollila, David W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (05) :608-613
[4]   Optimal Use of Re-Excision in Patients Diagnosed with Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Excisional Biopsy Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy [J].
Caughran, Jamie L. ;
Vicini, Frank A. ;
Kestin, Larry L. ;
Dekhne, Nayana S. ;
Benitez, Pamela R. ;
Goldstein, Neal S. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (11) :3020-3027
[5]   Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins [J].
Cellini, C ;
Hollenbeck, ST ;
Christos, P ;
Martins, D ;
Carson, J ;
Kemper, S ;
LaVigne, E ;
Chan, E ;
Simmons, R .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (10) :915-920
[6]   Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique [J].
Chagpar, AB ;
Martin, RCG ;
Hagendoorn, LJ ;
Chao, C ;
McMasters, KM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) :399-402
[7]   Significance of linear extent of breast carcinoma at surgical margin [J].
Darvishian, F ;
Hajdu, SI ;
DeRisi, DC .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) :48-51
[8]   A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy [J].
Dillon, MF ;
Hill, ADK ;
Quinn, CM ;
McDermott, EW ;
O'Higgins, N .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :333-339
[9]   FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH A POSITIVE REEXCISION AFTER EXCISIONAL BIOPSY FOR INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
JARDINES, L ;
FOWBLE, B ;
SCHULTZ, D ;
MACKIE, J ;
BUZBY, G ;
TOROSIAN, M ;
DALY, J ;
WEISS, M ;
OREL, S ;
ROSATO, E .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (05) :803-809
[10]   Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer [J].
Keskek, M ;
Kothari, M ;
Ardehali, B ;
Betambeau, N ;
Nasiri, N ;
Gui, GPH .
EJSO, 2004, 30 (10) :1058-1064