MANAGING MATURITY IN PROCESS-BASED IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS: A PERSPECTIVE OF THE ROMANIAN COMPANIES

被引:11
作者
Paunescu, Carmen [1 ]
Acatrinei , Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Bucharest 010701, Romania
关键词
organization maturity; process management; maturity assessment; sustainability improvement; factor analysis; Romanian organizations; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; MANAGEMENT MATURITY; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS MATURITY; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; GOVERNMENT; CMMI;
D O I
10.3846/16111699.2011.620149
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Building upon various models from the literature which assess the maturity level achieved by an organization at one moment in time, the paper introduces a model which helps organizations, interested in remaining competitive and achieving sustainability, to monitor and evaluate their process performance. Such as, the paper analyzes the relationships that exist among the critical components of an organization's management system at the strategic and operational level so that key drivers will become the heart of sustainable development. In particular, the paper focuses on how the organizational system influences process maturity profile of the Romanian companies. Data were collected in face-to-face structured-questionnaire interviews from 1302 public and private organizations from Romania. The dearth of empirical research examining organization process maturity in emerging countries constitutes a critical gap in the business process management literature that needs much more attention from scholars. For the purpose of this paper, a factor analysis was employed to explain the pattern of correlations within a set of observed variables that determine the process maturity profile of the Romanian companies. The research results show that there are strong positive correlations between the variables examined that account for a higher level of maturity and performance of organization's processes.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 241
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ahmed F., 2010, INFORM SYSTEMS FRONT, P543
[2]  
Andersen E. S., 2003, International Journal of Project Management, V21, P457, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00088-1
[3]   E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model [J].
Andersen, Kim Viborg ;
Henriksen, Helle Zinner .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2006, 23 (02) :236-248
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CAP MAT MOD INT CMMI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J INFORM SYSTEMS ED
[6]   A Software Maintenance Maturity Model (S3M): Measurement Practices at Maturity Levels 3 and 4 [J].
April, Alain ;
Abran, Alain .
ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2009, 233 :73-87
[7]   Assessment of quality and maturity level of R&D [J].
Berg, P ;
Leinonen, M ;
Leivo, V ;
Pihlajamaa, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (01) :29-35
[8]  
Bicker T., 2004, SUSTAINABILITY MANAG
[9]  
Bovee CourtlandL., 2005, EXCELLENCE BUSINESS, VRevis
[10]   Process improvement for small firms: An evaluation of the RAPID assessment-based method [J].
Cater-Steel, Aileen ;
Toleman, Mark ;
Rout, Terry .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 48 (05) :323-334