Augmented Cross-Sectional Studies with Abbreviated Follow-up for Estimating HIV Incidence

被引:3
作者
Claggett, B. [1 ]
Lagakos, S. W. [1 ]
Wang, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Augmented; Cross-sectional studies; False negative; Incidence estimators; CAPTURE ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; INFECTION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01632.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on a sensitive and less-sensitive test offers great advantages over the traditional cohort study. However, its use has been limited due to concerns about the false negative rate of the less-sensitive test, reflecting the phenomenon that some subjects may remain negative permanently on the less-sensitive test. Wang and Lagakos (2010, Biometrics 66, 864874) propose an augmented cross-sectional design that provides one way to estimate the size of the infected population who remain negative permanently and subsequently incorporate this information in the cross-sectional incidence estimator. In an augmented cross-sectional study, subjects who test negative on the less-sensitive test in the cross-sectional survey are followed forward for transition into the nonrecent state, at which time they would test positive on the less-sensitive test. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate length of follow-up and the size of the infected population who remain nonreactive permanently to the less-sensitive test. In this article, we assess the impact of varying follow-up time on the resulting incidence estimators from an augmented cross-sectional study, evaluate the robustness of cross-sectional estimators to assumptions about the existence and the size of the subpopulation who will remain negative permanently, and propose a new estimator based on abbreviated follow-up time (AF). Compared to the original estimator from an augmented cross-sectional study, the AF estimator allows shorter follow-up time and does not require estimation of the mean window period, defined as the average time between detectability of HIV infection with the sensitive and less-sensitive tests. It is shown to perform well in a wide range of settings. We discuss when the AF estimator would be expected to perform well and offer design considerations for an augmented cross-sectional study with abbreviated follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 74
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gaps in patient-centered follow-up cancer care: a cross sectional study
    Hobden, Breanne
    Turon, Heidi
    Waller, Amy
    Carey, Mariko
    Proietto, Anthony
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [22] Adherence to clinical follow-up recommendations for liver function tests: A cross-sectional study of patients with HCV and their associated risk behaviors
    Dormanesh, Allison
    Wang, Judy Huei-yu
    Mishori, Ranit
    Cupertino, Paula
    Longcoy, Joshua
    Kassaye, Seble
    Kaljee, Linda
    Smith, Coleman
    Loffredo, Christopher A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2021, 23
  • [23] One-year follow-up of hip fracture complications and patient-reported measures: A mixed methods cross-sectional study
    Mathiesen, Josefin
    Ivarsson, Bodil
    Johansson, Anders
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2020, 38
  • [24] A Simplified Formula for Inferring HIV Incidence from Cross-Sectional Surveys Using a Test for Recent Infection
    Welte, Alex
    McWalter, Thomas A.
    Barnighausen, Till
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 2009, 25 (01) : 125 - 126
  • [25] High risk of complications following surgical treatment of patella fractures - a cross-sectional study of 798 patients with mean 6.4 years follow-up
    Larsen, Peter
    Arildsen, Marie
    Kristensen, Kasper
    Lyng, Kristian D.
    Elsoe, Rasmus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 50 (03) : 1127 - 1134
  • [26] Scientific Writing Series: Cross-Sectional studies
    Quispe, Antonio M.
    Valentin, Elvis B.
    Gutierrez, Ana R.
    Mares, Juan D.
    REVISTA DEL CUERPO MEDICO DEL HOSPITAL NACIONAL ALMANZOR AGUINAGA ASENJO, 2020, 13 (01): : 72 - 77
  • [27] ASSESSING THE DIRECTION OF CAUSALITY IN CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES
    FLANDERS, WD
    LIN, L
    PIRKLE, JL
    CAUDILL, SP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 135 (08) : 926 - 935
  • [28] Cross-Sectional Studies Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Cheng, Zhenshun
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (01) : S65 - S71
  • [29] Long-term follow-up of the incidence of Helicobacter pylori
    Rowland, M.
    Clyne, M.
    Daly, L.
    O'Connor, H.
    Bourke, B.
    Bury, G.
    O'Dowd, T.
    Connolly, L.
    Ryan, J.
    Shovlin, S.
    Dolan, B.
    Drumm, B.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2018, 24 (09) : 980 - 984
  • [30] Estimation of HIV incidence in Malawi from cross-sectional population-based sero-prevalence data
    Misiri, Humphrey
    Edriss, Abdi
    Aalen, Odd O.
    Dahl, Fredrik A.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2012, 15