TWO MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT-WHAT INTERNATIONAL LAW CAN DO ABOUT GENOME EDITING

被引:0
作者
Lee, Tsung-Ling [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Grad Inst Hlth & Biotechnol Law, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] TMU Shuang Ho Hosp, Brain & Consciousness Res Ctr, New Taipei, Taiwan
来源
ASIAN JOURNAL OF WTO & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH LAW AND POLICY | 2019年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
gene drives; responsible research and innovation; global administrative law; the right to science and culture; public engagement; emerging technologies; GENE DRIVE; SCIENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
With its ability to transform the ecosystem, gene drives, a powerful genome-editing technology, poses nuanced regulatory challenges. In particular, as gene drives can override the normal rule of inheritance, where the impacts of gene-drive modified organisms on the environment could be irreversible, leading to a permanent population change. Moreover, as these gene-drive modified organisms are designed to spread to large populations, they can also penetrate national and geographic borders, with global implications. Insofar as gene drive applications could be both potentially beneficial as well as hazardous to the world, this article seeks to explore ways in which international law could provide a useful platform to engage the relevant stakeholders in general, and encourage responsible science in specific.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 265
页数:39
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [41] Science's new social contract with society
    Gibbons, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 402 (6761) : C81 - C84
  • [42] GOLDSMITH J.L., 2005, LIMITS INT LAW
  • [43] Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics
    Goodin, Robert E.
    Dryzek, John S.
    [J]. POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2006, 34 (02) : 219 - 244
  • [44] The rise of the ethical license
    Guerrini, Christi J.
    Curnutte, Margaret A.
    Sherkow, Jacob S.
    Scott, Christopher T.
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (01) : 22 - 24
  • [45] Gutmann A., 2009, WHY DELIBERATIVE DEM
  • [46] A compliance-based theory of international law
    Guzman, AT
    [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2002, 90 (06) : 1823 - 1887
  • [47] Hannum H., 1995, J INT COMP LAW, V25, P287
  • [48] Global administrative law: The ouest for principles and values
    Harlow, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2006, 17 (01) : 187 - 214
  • [49] Modernizing biomedical regulation: foresight and values in the promotion of responsible research and innovation
    Harmon, Shawn H. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES, 2016, 3 (03): : 680 - 686
  • [50] Johnstone Ian., 2011, POWER DELIBERATION I