Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered over 4 or 11 days: A comparison of acute toxicity and quality of life

被引:39
作者
Jain, Suneil [1 ]
Poon, Ian [2 ]
Soliman, Hany [2 ]
Keller, Brian [2 ]
Kim, Anthony [2 ]
Lochray, Fiona [2 ]
Yeung, Latifa [3 ]
Cheung, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Ctr Canc Res & Cell Biol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Sunnybrook Odette Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Dept Pediat,Rouge Valley Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
Lung cancer; Lung metastases; Stereotactic; SBRT; SABR; Acute toxicity; Quality of life; RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL; ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; FRACTIONS; QLQ-C30; TUMORS; CHART;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.045
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The optimal duration over which lung SBRT should be delivered is unknown. We conducted a randomized pilot study in patients treated with four fractions of lung SBRT delivered over 4 or over 11 days. Methods: Patients with a peripheral solitary lung tumor (NSCLC or pulmonary metastasis), <= 5 cm were eligible. For NSCLC lung tumors <= 3 cm, a dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions was used, otherwise 52 Gy in 4 fractions was delivered. Patients were randomized to receive treatment over 4 consecutive days or over 11 days. The primary end-point was acute grade >= 2 toxicity. Secondary end-points included quality of life (QOL) assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires. Results: Fifty four patients were enrolled. More patients in the 11 day group had respiratory symptoms at baseline. 55.6% patients treated over 4 days and 33.3% of patients treated over 11 days experienced acute grade >= 2 toxicity (p = 0.085). Dyspnea, fatigue and coughing domains were worse in the 11 day group at baseline. At 1 and 4 months, more patients in the 4 day group experienced a clinically meaningful worsening in the dyspnea QOL domain compared to the 11 day group (44.5% vs 15.4%, p = 0.02; 38.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.03, respectively). However, raw QOL scores were not different at these time-points between treatment groups. Conclusions: Grade 2 or higher acute toxicity was more common in the 4 day group, approaching statistical significance. More patients treated on 4 consecutive days reported a clinically meaningful increase in dyspnea, although interpretation of these results is challenging due to baseline imbalance between treatment groups. Larger studies are required to validate these results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 325
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Hiraoka M, 2010, CHIC MULT S THOR CHI
  • [12] Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Gundy, Chad M.
    Haasbeek, Cornelis J. A.
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Senan, Suresh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (07) : 1148 - 1154
  • [13] Lee AWM, 1999, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V52, P207
  • [14] Prostate stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy using a standard linear accelerator: Toxicity, biochemical, and pathological outcomes
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Cheung, Patrick
    D'Alimonte, Laura
    Deabreu, Andrea
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Zhang, Liying
    Tang, Colin
    Quon, Harvey
    Jain, Suneil
    Pang, Geordi
    Nam, Robert
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (02) : 153 - 158
  • [15] Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame
    Nagata, Y
    Takayama, K
    Matsuo, Y
    Norihisa, Y
    Mizowaki, T
    Sakamoto, T
    Sakamoto, M
    Mitsumori, M
    Shibuya, K
    Araki, N
    Yano, S
    Hiraoka, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (05): : 1427 - 1431
  • [16] Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HypoFXSRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results of 257 patients in a Japanese multi-institutional study
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    Shirato, Hiroki
    Nagata, Yasushi
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Fujino, Masaharu
    Gomi, Kotaro
    Niibe, Yuzuru
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    Hayakawa, Kazushige
    Takai, Yoshihiro
    Kimura, Tomoki
    Takeda, Atsuya
    Ouchi, Atsushi
    Hareyama, Masato
    Kokubo, Masaki
    Hara, Ryusuke
    Itami, Jun
    Yamada, Kazunari
    Araki, Tsutomu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (07) : S94 - S100
  • [17] Analysis and interpretation of health-related quality-of-life data from clinical trials: basic approach of The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group
    Osoba, D
    Beziak, A
    Brundage, M
    Zee, B
    Tu, DS
    Pater, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (02) : 280 - 287
  • [18] Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, 2012, SEAML PHAS 1 2 STUD
  • [19] Radiation therapy oncology group 0915, 2010, RAND PHAS 2 STUD COM
  • [20] Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial
    Saunders, M
    Dische, S
    Barrett, A
    Harvey, A
    Griffiths, G
    Parmar, M
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 52 (02) : 137 - 148