Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered over 4 or 11 days: A comparison of acute toxicity and quality of life

被引:39
作者
Jain, Suneil [1 ]
Poon, Ian [2 ]
Soliman, Hany [2 ]
Keller, Brian [2 ]
Kim, Anthony [2 ]
Lochray, Fiona [2 ]
Yeung, Latifa [3 ]
Cheung, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Ctr Canc Res & Cell Biol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Sunnybrook Odette Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Dept Pediat,Rouge Valley Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
Lung cancer; Lung metastases; Stereotactic; SBRT; SABR; Acute toxicity; Quality of life; RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL; ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; FRACTIONS; QLQ-C30; TUMORS; CHART;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.045
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The optimal duration over which lung SBRT should be delivered is unknown. We conducted a randomized pilot study in patients treated with four fractions of lung SBRT delivered over 4 or over 11 days. Methods: Patients with a peripheral solitary lung tumor (NSCLC or pulmonary metastasis), <= 5 cm were eligible. For NSCLC lung tumors <= 3 cm, a dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions was used, otherwise 52 Gy in 4 fractions was delivered. Patients were randomized to receive treatment over 4 consecutive days or over 11 days. The primary end-point was acute grade >= 2 toxicity. Secondary end-points included quality of life (QOL) assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires. Results: Fifty four patients were enrolled. More patients in the 11 day group had respiratory symptoms at baseline. 55.6% patients treated over 4 days and 33.3% of patients treated over 11 days experienced acute grade >= 2 toxicity (p = 0.085). Dyspnea, fatigue and coughing domains were worse in the 11 day group at baseline. At 1 and 4 months, more patients in the 4 day group experienced a clinically meaningful worsening in the dyspnea QOL domain compared to the 11 day group (44.5% vs 15.4%, p = 0.02; 38.5% vs 12.0%, p = 0.03, respectively). However, raw QOL scores were not different at these time-points between treatment groups. Conclusions: Grade 2 or higher acute toxicity was more common in the 4 day group, approaching statistical significance. More patients treated on 4 consecutive days reported a clinically meaningful increase in dyspnea, although interpretation of these results is challenging due to baseline imbalance between treatment groups. Larger studies are required to validate these results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 325
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] Final results of the randomized phase III CHARTWEL-trial (ARO 97-1) comparing hyperfractionated-accelerated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Baumann, M.
    Herrmann, T.
    Koch, R.
    Matthiessen, W.
    Appold, S.
    Wahlers, B.
    Kepka, L.
    Marschke, G.
    Feltl, D.
    Fietkau, R.
    Budach, V.
    Dunst, J.
    Dziadziuszko, R.
    Krause, M.
    Zips, D.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 100 (01) : 76 - 85
  • [3] Bentzen SM, 2000, INT J RADIAT BIOL, V76, P453, DOI 10.1080/095530000138448
  • [4] THE EORTC QLQ-LC13 - A MODULAR SUPPLEMENT TO THE EORTC CORE QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (QLQ-C30) FOR USE IN LUNG-CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS
    BERGMAN, B
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    KAASA, S
    SULLIVAN, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) : 635 - 642
  • [5] Radiographic response and clinical toxicity following SBRT for stage I lung cancer
    Bradley, Jefftey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (07) : S118 - S124
  • [6] HIGH DOSE PER-FRACTION IRRADIATION OF LIMITED LUNG VOLUMES USING AN IMAGE-GUIDED, HIGHLY FOCUSED IRRADIATOR: SIMULATING STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN A SMALL-ANIMAL MODEL
    Cho, Jaeho
    Kodym, Reinhard
    Seliounine, Serguei
    Richardson, James A.
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    Story, Michael D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (03): : 895 - 902
  • [7] Creach KM, 2012, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V104, P4
  • [8] A randomised multicentre trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer
    Dische, S
    Saunders, M
    Barrett, A
    Harvey, A
    Gibson, D
    Parmar, M
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (02) : 123 - 136
  • [9] Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis
    Garcia-Barros, M
    Paris, F
    Cordon-Cardo, C
    Lyden, D
    Rafii, S
    Haimovitz-Friedman, A
    Fuks, Z
    Kolesnick, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5622) : 1155 - 1159
  • [10] A comparison of two immobilization systems for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors
    Han, Kathy
    Cheung, Patrick
    Basran, Parminder S.
    Poon, Ian
    Yeung, Latifa
    Lochray, Fiona
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 95 (01) : 103 - 108