Acute-alcohol effects on the Experiential Discounting Task (EDT) and a question-based measure of delay discounting

被引:134
作者
Reynolds, B
Richards, JB
de Wit, H
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Pediat, Columbus Childrens Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Res Inst Addict, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
alcohol; impulsivity; acute effects; delay discounting; human;
D O I
10.1016/j.pbb.2006.01.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Alcohol is widely believed to increase impulsive behavior. However, this has been difficult to demonstrate for impulsive choice using existing measures of delay discounting. We hypothesized a new real-time discounting task would be more sensitive to acute effects of alcohol. Measures included were a (a) question-based measure of delay discounting, the (b) Experiential Discounting Task (EDT), the (c) Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), the (d) Stop Task, and the (e) Go/No-Go Task. A three-session, double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subjects design was used. Placebo, 0.4, or 0.8g/kg alcohol doses were administered in a counterbalanced order over the three testing sessions. Twenty four (13 females) healthy social drinkers between the ages of 21 and 35 participated. Alcohol increased impulsive responding only on the EDT and the Stop Task. On the EDT, participants performed more impulsively after the 0.8g/kg dose compared to placebo, whereas on the Stop Task, both the 0.4 and 0.8g/kg doses increased impulsive responding. Alcohol had no significant effects on the other measures. The EDT was more sensitive to the acute effects of alcohol than previously used discounting tasks. Procedural differences between the EDT and question-based measures are discussed in the context of these divergent findings. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 202
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Alcohol-induced impairment of behavioral control: Effects on the alteration and suppression of prepotent responses [J].
Abroms, BD ;
Fillmore, MT ;
Marczinski, CA .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2003, 64 (05) :687-695
[2]   Impulsivity as a common process across borderline personality and substance use disorders [J].
Bornovalova, MA ;
Lejuez, CW ;
Daughters, SB ;
Rosenthal, MZ ;
Lynch, TR .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2005, 25 (06) :790-812
[3]   Substance use, injury, and risk-taking dispositions in the general population [J].
Cherpitel, CJ .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 23 (01) :121-126
[4]   Effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol on a measure of behavioral inhibition in humans [J].
de Wit, H ;
Crean, J ;
Richards, JB .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 114 (04) :830-837
[5]   Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers [J].
de Wit, H ;
Enggasser, JL ;
Richards, JB .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 27 (05) :813-825
[6]   Alcohol and behavioral control: Impaired response inhibition and flexibility in social drinkers [J].
Easdon, CM ;
Vogel-Sprott, M .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 8 (03) :387-394
[7]   Compensating for alcohol-induced impairment: Alcohol expectancies and behavioral disinhibition [J].
Fillmore, MT ;
Blackburn, J .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2002, 63 (02) :237-246
[8]  
GALANTER M, 1997, RECENT DEV ALCOHOLIS
[9]  
Haertzen CA, 1987, METHODS ASSESSING RE, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4812-5_24
[10]   Relationship of alcohol use and risky sexual behavior: A review and analysis of findings [J].
HalpernFelsher, BL ;
Millstein, SG ;
Ellen, JM .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1996, 19 (05) :331-336