Comparative performance evaluation of full-scale anaerobic and aerobic wastewater treatment processes in Brazil

被引:29
作者
von Sperling, M. [1 ]
Oliveira, S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Sanit & Environm Engn, BR-30110060 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
aerobic and anaerobic technology; comparative performance evaluation; effluent quality;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2009.841
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article evaluates and compares the actual behavior of 166 full-scale anaerobic and aerobic wastewater treatment plants in operation in Brazil, providing information on the performance of the processes in terms of the quality of the generated effluent and the removal efficiency achieved. The observed results of effluent concentrations and removal efficiencies of the constituents BOD, COD, TSS (total suspended solids), TN (total nitrogen), TP (total phosphorus) and FC (faecal or thermotolerant coliforms) have been compared with the typical expected performance reported in the literature. The treatment technologies selected for study were: ( a) predominantly anaerobic: (i) septic tank + anaerobic filter (ST + AF), (ii) UASB reactor without post-treatment (UASB) and (iii) UASB reactor followed by several post-treatment processes (UASB + POST); (b) predominantly aerobic: (iv) facultative pond (FP), (v) anaerobic pond followed by facultative pond (AP + FP) and (vi) activated sludge (AS). The results, confirmed by statistical tests, showed that, in general, the best performance was achieved by AS, but closely followed by UASB reactor, when operating with any kind of post-treatment. The effluent quality of the anaerobic processes ST + AF and UASB reactor without post-treatment was very similar to the one presented by facultative pond, a simpler aerobic process, regarding organic matter.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse, VFourth, P1819
[2]  
Arceivala S. J., 1981, WASTEWATER TREATMENT, P892
[3]   Post-treatment options for the anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater [J].
Chernicharo C.A.L. .
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2006, 5 (1) :73-92
[4]   ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE AND WASTE-WATER [J].
LETTINGA, G ;
DEMAN, A ;
VANDERLAST, ARM ;
WIEGANT, W ;
VANKNIPPENBERG, K ;
FRIJNS, J ;
VANBUUREN, JCL .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (09) :67-73
[5]  
MARA DD, 2003, DOMESTIC WASTEWATER, P292
[6]  
OLIVEIRA SC, 2006, 5 IWA WORLD WAT C 20
[7]  
Qasim S., 1985, Wastewater treatment plants: Planning design and operation
[8]   A review: The anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactors [J].
Seghezzo, L ;
Zeeman, G ;
van Lier, JB ;
Hamelers, HVM ;
Lettinga, G .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 65 (03) :175-190
[9]  
Von Sperling M., 2005, BIOL WASTEWATER TREA, P1496
[10]  
*WEF ASCE, 1992, DES MUN WAST TREATM, P1592