No polarization of type 1 or type 2 precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood stem cell collections of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, GM-CSF, or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF

被引:17
|
作者
Gazitt, Y [1 ]
Akay, C [1 ]
Thomas, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/scd.2006.15.269
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most efficient antigen-presenting cells and play a role in immune reconstitution after autologous transplantation. Recent reports suggest that mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) containing regimens polarizes DCs into pDC2, which could potentially result with increased Th2 response and decreased graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic transplantation and with decreased cytotoxic Th1 response and graft versus tumor effect, which in autologous transplantation could translate into increased relapse rate. Previously, we have shown that non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients receiving cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF, G-CSF or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF for stem cell collection, mobilize up to five-fold more mature CD80(+) DCs compared to CTX plus G-CSF mobilized patients. Here, we analyzed samples from the same study for the number of pDC1 and pDC2 subsets in blood and apheresis products obtained from these patients. Samples from 29 patients were collected. Patients mobilized with CTX plus G-CSF collected a mean of 1.2 +/- 0.4 x 10(6) pDC1/kg per day and 2.2 +/- 1 x 10(6) pDC2/kg per day, whereas patients mobilized with CTX plus GM-CSF collected a mean of 1.1 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) pDC1 and 1.5 +/- 0.9 x 10(6) pDC2/kg per day. Patients mobilized with CTX plus GM-CSF followed by G-CSF collected 2.5 +/- 1.1 x 10(6) pDC1 and 2 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) pDC2/kg per day, with significantly higher levels of pDC1 +/- pDC2 cells. No significant difference was observed in pDC1/pDC2 ratio between the three mobilization arms. Patients mobilized with the GM-CSF-containing regimen had a higher probability for survival compared to patients receiving G-CSF alone (median of 55 months vs. 15 months; p = 0.02). These results support the hypothesis that higher levels of DCs in the graft might be associated with prolonged survival of autotransplanted NHL patients. Further similar studies are merited in a larger population of NHL patients.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 277
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF
    Jansen, J
    Thompson, EM
    Hanks, S
    Greenspan, AR
    Thompson, JM
    Dugan, MJ
    Akard, LP
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 23 (12) : 1251 - 1256
  • [22] Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF
    J Jansen
    EM Thompson
    S Hanks
    AR Greenspan
    JM Thompson
    MJ Dugan
    LP Akard
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1999, 23 : 1251 - 1256
  • [23] G-CSF versus GM-CSF after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant: A resource utilization study.
    Jansen, J
    Thompson, EM
    Hanks, S
    Greenspan, A
    Dugan, MJ
    Thompson, JM
    Akard, LP
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 130A - 130A
  • [24] ARE GROWTH-FACTOR (GF) COMBINATIONS SUPERIOR TO G-CSF ALONE FOR MOBILIZATION OF PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS (PBSC) - A RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING G-CSF TO G-CSF WITH GM-CSF FOR PBSC MOBILIZATION
    SPITZER, G
    MATHEWS, M
    DUNPHY, F
    BOWERS, C
    PETRUSKA, P
    VELASQUEZ, W
    BROUN, G
    KRONMUELLER, N
    NIEMEYER, R
    MCINTYRE, W
    ADKINS, D
    BLOOD, 1994, 84 (10) : A107 - A107
  • [25] Chemotherapy followed by G-CSF mobilized donor leukocytes and subcutaneous Gm-CSF application for the treatment of relapsed Hodgkin disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
    Becker, C
    Skibbe, T
    Leiblein, S
    Hegenbarth, U
    Uharek, L
    Niederwieser, D
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 27 : S274 - S274
  • [26] GM-CSF vs. G-CSF: Engraftment characteristics following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant.
    Zumberg, MS
    Nejame, CS
    Leather, HL
    Moreb, JS
    Reddy, VS
    Khan, SA
    Finiewicz, KJ
    Eagle, DA
    Meyer, C
    Wingard, JR
    BLOOD, 2000, 96 (11) : 297A - 297A
  • [27] Randomized trial of sequential administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF vs. G-CSF alone following peripheral blood progenitor cell autograft in solid tumors
    Recchia, F
    Accorsi, P
    Bonfini, T
    De Filippis, S
    Grimaldi, M
    Corrao, G
    Rosselli, M
    Amiconi, G
    Iacone, A
    Rea, S
    JOURNAL OF INTERFERON AND CYTOKINE RESEARCH, 2000, 20 (02): : 171 - 177
  • [28] Randomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy
    G Spitzer
    D Adkins
    M Mathews
    W Velasquez
    C Bowers
    F Dunphy
    N Kronmueller
    R Niemeyer
    W McIntyre
    P Petruska
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1997, 20 : 921 - 930
  • [29] Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: High-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone
    Alegre, A
    Tomas, JF
    MartinezChamorro, C
    GilFernandez, JJ
    FernandezVillalta, MJ
    Arranz, R
    Diaz, MA
    Granda, A
    Bernardo, MR
    Escudero, A
    LopezLorenzo, JL
    FernandezRanada, JM
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [30] Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone
    A Alegre
    JF Tomás
    C Martínez-Chamorro
    JJ Gil-Fernández
    MJ Fernández-Villalta
    R Arranz
    MA Díaz
    A Granda
    MR Bernardo
    A Escudero
    JL López-Lorenzo
    JM Fernández-Rañada
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1997, 20 : 211 - 217