Factors Associated With Crestal Bone Loss Following Dental Implant Placement in a Longitudinal Follow-up Study

被引:0
作者
Kim, Sang Y. [1 ]
Dodson, Thomas B. [2 ,3 ]
Do, Duy T. [4 ]
Wadhwa, Gary
Chuang, Sung-Kiang [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] INOVA Fairfax Hosp, Falls Church, VA USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ctr Appl Clin Invest, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Dent Med, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
crestal bone changes; dental implants; risk factors; SPONTANEOUS EARLY EXPOSURE; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; SUBMERGED IMPLANTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; LEVEL CHANGES; RISK-FACTORS; IMMEDIATE; FAILURE; TIME; STABILITY;
D O I
10.7232/JKIIE.2015.41.6.579
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to estimate the magnitude of crestal bone loss and to identify factors associated with changes in crestal bone height following placement of dental implants. This was a retrospective cohort study, consisting of a sample derived from the population of patients who had at least 1 dental implant placed in a community practice over a 10-year period. A total of 11 predictor variables were grouped into demographic, related health status, anatomic, implant-specific, and operative categories. The primary outcome variable was a change in crestal bone height (mm) over the course of follow-up. The secondary outcome variable was crestal bone loss at 1 year grouped into 2 categories (bone loss >1.5 mm and <= 1.5 mm). Univariate and multivariate regression mixed-effects models were developed to identify variables associated with crestal bone level changes over time. P values <=.05 were considered statistically significant. The study sample was composed of 85 subjects who received 148 implants. The mean change of the crestal bone was 2.1 +/- 1.5 mm (range = -12.5 to 0.5 mm; median = -1.77 mm). In the multivariate model, none of the variables studied were statistically associated with mean crestal bone loss. Among 84 (66.1%) implants with bone loss >1.5 mm within 1 year, no variables were associated with bone loss in the multivariate model. Of the 11 predictor variables evaluated in this study, none were statistically significant with regard to an increased risk for crestal bone loss or for excessive bone loss within the first year after implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 585
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vivo Comparison of Crestal Bone Heights Following Implant Placement with "Flapless" and "Flap" Techniques in the Sites of Early Loaded Implants
    Pahuja, Suhani Kukreja
    Negi, Pooja
    Singh, Anjali
    Singh, Gangesh Bahadur
    Rayast, Deepa
    Alinz, Manisha
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (05): : 370 - 374
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Flapless Implant Placement: Follow-Up Results From a Multicenter Study
    Becker, William
    Goldstein, Moshe
    Becker, Burton E.
    Sennerby, Lars
    Kois, Dean
    Hujoel, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (02) : 347 - 352
  • [33] Evaluation of Survival Rates of Dental Implants and the Risk Factors: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study
    Jain, Shailesh
    Hemavardhini, Addugala
    Ranjan, Maitreyi
    Pasricha, Neeta
    Thakar, Sahil S.
    Soni, Keyur J.
    Hassan, Sahba
    Goyal, Keshav
    Singh, Diksha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [34] A 22-Year Follow Up of Immediate Implant Placement without Bone Augmentation: A Case Series Study
    Assery, Mansour
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (02): : 101 - 106
  • [35] Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Controlled HIV-Positive Patients: A Prospective Longitudinal Study with 1-Year Follow-Up
    Gherlone, Enrico F.
    Cappare, Paolo
    Tecco, Simona
    Polizzi, Elisabetta
    Pantaleo, Giuseppe
    Gastaldi, Giorgio
    Grusovin, Maria Gabriella
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (04) : 725 - 734
  • [36] Comparison of clinical peri-implant indices and crestal bone levels around narrow and regular diameter implants placed in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: A 3-year follow-up study
    Al-Shibani, Nouf
    Al-Aali, Khulud Abdulrahman
    Al-Hamdan, Rana Sulaiman
    Alrabiah, Mohammed
    Basunbul, Ghadeer
    Abduljabbar, Tariq
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (02) : 247 - 252
  • [37] Evaluation of Selected Prognostic Factors in Dental Implant Treatment - Two-Year Follow-Up
    Kozakiewicz, Marcin
    Szyszkowski, Adam
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2014, 51 (04) : 439 - 447
  • [38] A retrospective study on the crestal bone loss associated with different implant surfaces in chronic periodontitis patients under maintenance
    Gallego, Luis
    Sicilia, Alberto
    Sicilia, Pelayo
    Mallo, Carmen
    Cuesta, Susana
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (06) : 557 - 567
  • [39] A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
    Jain, Shailesh
    Mattoo, Khurshid
    Khalid, Imran
    Baig, Fawaz A. H.
    Kota, Mohammad Zahir
    Ishfaq, Muhammad
    Ibrahim, Mohammed
    Hassan, Sahba
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29
  • [40] Factors associated with patency loss and actuarial patency rate following post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury repair: long-term follow-up
    Gustavo Martínez-Mier
    Pedro I. Moreno-Ley
    Daniel Mendez-Rico
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, 405 : 999 - 1006