Comparison between 68Ga-bombesin (68Ga-BZH3) and the cRGD tetramer 68Ga-RGD4 studies in an experimental nude rat model with a neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor cell line

被引:11
作者
Cheng, Caixia [1 ]
Pan, Leyun [1 ]
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia [1 ]
Schaefer, Martin [2 ]
Waengler, Carmen [3 ]
Waengler, Bjoer [3 ]
Haberkorn, Uwe [1 ]
Strauss, Ludwig G. [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Clin Cooperat Unit Nucl Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiopharmaceut Chem, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Univ Hosp Munich, Dept Nucl Med, Munich, Germany
来源
EJNMMI RESEARCH | 2011年 / 1卷
关键词
Ga-68-bombesin; Ga-68-RGD tetramer; PET; kinetic modeling; neuroendocrine tumors; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS; INTEGRIN ALPHA-V-BETA-3; GA-68-LABELED BOMBESIN; PROSTATE-CANCER; VITRO/IN VIVO; F-18; FDG; RECEPTOR; PET; GA-68-DOTATOC;
D O I
10.1186/2191-219X-1-34
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: Receptor scintigraphy gains more interest for diagnosis and treatment of tumors, in particular for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). We used a pan-Bombesin analog, the peptide DOTA-PEG2-[D-tyr(6), beta-Ala(11), Thi(13), Nle(14)] BN(6-14) amide (BZH3). BZH3 binds to at least three receptor subtypes: the BB1 (Neuromedin B), BB2 (Gastrin-releasing peptide, GRP), and BB3. Imaging of alpha nu beta 3 integrin expression playing an important role in angiogenesis and metastasis was accomplished with a Ga-68-RGD tetramer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the kinetics and to compare both tracers in an experimental NET cell line. Methods: This study comprised nine nude rats inoculated with the pancreatic tumor cell line AR42J. Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) scans using Ga-68-BZH3 and Ga-68-RGD tetramer were performed (Ga-68-RGD tetramer: n = 4, Ga-68-BZH3: n = 5). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated, and a two-tissue compartmental learning-machine model (calculation of K1 - k4 vessel density (VB) and receptor binding potential (RBP)) as well as a non-compartmental model based on the fractal dimension was used for quantitative analysis of both tracers. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the kinetic data. Results: The PET kinetic parameters showed significant differences when individual parameters were compared between groups. Significant differences were found in FD, VB, K1, and RBP (p = 0.0275, 0.05, 0.05, and 0.0275 respectively). The 56- to 60-min SUV for Ga-68-BZH3, with a range of 0.86 to 1.29 (median, 1.19) was higher than the corresponding value for the Ga-68-RGD tetramer, with a range of 0.78 to 1.31 (median, 0.99). Furthermore, FD, VB, K1, and RBP for Ga-68-BZH3 were generally higher than the corresponding values for the Ga-68-RGD tetramer, whereas k3 was slightly higher for Ga-68-RGD tetramer. Conclusions: As a parameter that reflects receptor binding, the increase of K1 for Ga-68-BZH3 indicated higher expression of bombesin receptors than that of the alpha nu beta 3 integrin in neuroendocrine tumors. Ga-68-BZH3 seems better suited for diagnosis of NETs owing to higher global tracer uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adams S, 1998, EUR J NUCL MED, V25, P79
  • [2] Evaluation of 64Cu-Labeled Bifunctional Chelate-Bombesin Conjugates
    Ait-Mohand, Samia
    Fournier, Patrick
    Dumulon-Perreault, Veronique
    Kiefer, Garry E.
    Jurek, Paul
    Ferreira, Cara L.
    Benard, Francois
    Guerin, Brigitte
    [J]. BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY, 2011, 22 (08) : 1729 - 1735
  • [3] Ambrosini V, 2010, Q J NUCL MED MOL IM, V54, P16
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, World J Nucl Med, DOI DOI 10.1102/14
  • [5] Baish JW, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P8348
  • [6] Imaging of integrin αvβ3 expression
    Beer, Ambros J.
    Schwaiger, Markus
    [J]. CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2008, 27 (04) : 631 - 644
  • [7] Peptide receptor therapies in neuroendocrine tumors
    Bodei, L.
    Ferone, D.
    Grana, C. M.
    Cremonesi, M.
    Signore, A.
    Dierckx, R. A.
    Paganelli, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2009, 32 (04): : 360 - 369
  • [8] Breeman WAP, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1650
  • [9] Burger C, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1818
  • [10] Cai Weibo, 2006, Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, V6, P407, DOI 10.2174/187152006778226530