Prognostic and health management for safety barriers in infrastructures: Opportunities and challenges

被引:0
作者
Zhang, A. [1 ]
Liu, Y. [1 ]
Barros, A. [1 ]
Wang, Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Tianjin Chengjian Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD | 2018年
关键词
INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; HYBRID PROGNOSTICS; METHODOLOGY; DESIGN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Different types of safety barriers are deployed in many infrastructures to reduce the occurrences of hazards, and protect people, environment and other assets in case the unexpected events have occurred and the capacity of these barriers against hazards can be weakened by degradations or the failures related to changes over lime. It is natural to adapt the approaches of Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) to monitor the conditions and measurable parameters of safety harriers, and predict their future performance by assessing the extent of degradations. This study aims to identify the uniqueness and possible challenges when implementing PHM on safety barriers. Definitions and classifications of safety barriers will be discussed with considering their installation environment in infrastructures, in order to reveal what kind of characteristics of harriers can lead to higher demand on prognosis and heath monitoring. Another objective of this paper is to review the qualitative and quantitative measures for the capacity and performance of safety harriers, and to explore the possible methods and research gaps in the assessments for different PHM strategies, taking account their effects on safety barriers, and effects on the infrastructures being protected by the barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1042
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, 1338112015 ISO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Qualification Standard IEC 61508
  • [3] A proactive decision making framework for condition-based maintenance
    Bousdekis, Alexandros
    Magoutas, Babis
    Apostolou, Dimitris
    Mentzas, Gregoris
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2015, 115 (07) : 1225 - 1250
  • [4] Brahimi M, 2016, PROGNOST SYST HEALT
  • [5] Reliability analysis of subsea blowout preventer control systems subjected to multiple error shocks
    Cai, Baoping
    Liu, Yonghong
    Liu, Zengkai
    Tian, Xiaojie
    Li, Hang
    Ren, Congkun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2012, 25 (06) : 1044 - 1054
  • [6] A simplified procedure for the analysis of Safety Instrumented Systems in the process industry application
    Catelani, M.
    Ciani, L.
    Luongo, V.
    [J]. MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2011, 51 (9-11) : 1503 - 1507
  • [7] Quantifying the influence of safety management on the reliability of safety barriers
    Duijm, NJ
    Goossens, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 130 (03) : 284 - 292
  • [8] Garcia C.M., 2010, ANN C PROGN HLTH MAN
  • [9] Gouriveau R., 2011, MAINTENANCE MODELLIN, P10
  • [10] Groot A., 2016, ADV PROCESS SAFETY B