Influence of the antiscatter grid on dose and image quality in pediatric interventional cardiology X-ray systems

被引:28
作者
Ubeda, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Vano, Eliseo [3 ,4 ]
Gonzalez, Luciano [3 ,4 ]
Miranda, Patricia [5 ]
机构
[1] Tarapaca Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Sci, Arica, Chile
[2] Tarapaca Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Radiol Sci Ctr, Arica, Chile
[3] Univ Complutense, Dept Radiol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[4] San Carlos Hosp, Madrid 28040, Spain
[5] Hosp Ninos Luis Calvo Mackenna, Cardiovasc Serv, Hemodynam Dept, Santiago, Chile
关键词
imaging; signal-to-noise ratio; high-contrast spatial resolution; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION; FLUOROSCOPY; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.24602
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To present a methodology and experimental results to assess the influence, in terms of dose and image quality, of the antiscatter grid (AG) in a pediatric cardiology X-ray system. Method Entrance surface air kerma and image quality, using a test object and different added thicknesses of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), for three different acquisition protocols, were measured with and without the AG, for fluoroscopy and cine modes. The image quality parameters, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), high-contrast spatial resolution (HCSR) and two figures of merit (FOM) were evaluated. Results The average bucky factor values measured during this experiment were 1.99, 2.49, 2.85, and 3.30, respectively for 4, 8, 12, and 16 cm of PMMA. SNR variations do not appear to be relevant when removing the AG. However, the use of AG improves HCSR significantly. Imaging the test object with 4 cm of PMMA seems appropriate without the AG, but for 8 cm (equivalent to chest thicknesses of 12 cm) and greater thicknesses, a good image quality would require the use of AG. Conclusions The AG should not be used for neonates and very young children with chest thicknesses equal to or less than 6 cm and weight less that 6 kg. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ANN ICRP IN PRESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 16261 EUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ICRP Publication, V89, DOI DOI 10.1016/0146-6453(81)90127-5
[4]   Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization [J].
Bacher, K ;
Bogaert, E ;
Lapere, R ;
De Wolf, D ;
Thierens, H .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (01) :83-89
[5]   Optimization of a fluoroscope to reduce radiation exposure in pediatric imaging [J].
Brown, PH ;
Thomas, RD ;
Silberberg, PJ ;
Johnson, LM .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 30 (04) :229-235
[6]   Radiation Safety Program for the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory [J].
Chambers, Charles E. ;
Fetterly, Kenneth A. ;
Holzer, Ralf ;
Lin, Pei-Jan Paul ;
Blankenship, James C. ;
Balter, Stephen ;
Laskey, Warren K. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 77 (04) :546-556
[7]   The SENTINEL project [J].
Faulkner, K. ;
Malone, J. ;
Vano, E. ;
Padovani, R. ;
Busch, H. P. ;
Zoetelief, J. ;
Bosmans, H. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) :3-5
[8]   Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems [J].
Fetterly, Kenneth A. ;
Schueler, Beth A. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (16) :4863-4880
[9]   Signal detectability in digital radiography: Spatial domain figures of merit [J].
Gagne, RM ;
Boswell, JS ;
Myers, KJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2180-2193
[10]   Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging [J].
Gislason, Amber J. ;
Davies, Andrew G. ;
Cowen, Arnold R. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (10) :5258-5269