Oncologists' and Patients' Perceptions of Initial, Intermediate, and Final Goals of Care Conversations

被引:27
作者
Schulman-Green, Dena [1 ]
Smith, Cardinale B. [2 ]
Lin, Jenny J. [2 ]
Feder, Shelli [1 ]
Bickell, Nina A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Nursing, POB 27399, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
Palliative; goal; conversation; qualitative research; COMMUNICATION; LIFE; DISCUSSIONS; BARRIERS; ILLNESS; END;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Although recommendations are for goals of care (GoC) conversations to happen early and often, their timing and content over the disease course remain unclear. Objectives. To describe perceptions of the timing and content of GoC conversations among oncologists and patients with advanced cancer. Methods. Semi-structured interviews with oncologists and patients at four hospitals in New York and Connecticut. We analyzed data using interpretive description. Results. Oncologists (n = 21) were 67% male, averaged 46 years old (range 34-68 years), and had a mean 20 years (range 8-42 years) in practice. Advanced cancer patients (n = 39) were 59% female with a mean age of 58 years (range 26-88 years). Oncologists and patients viewed GoC conversations along an initial, intermediate, and final continuum. Oncologists reported having initial GoC conversations to build rapport, provide disease information, and clarify and consider treatment intent and options. Intermediate conversations focused on changes in treatment and side effects. Final conversations occurred when patients were hospice-eligible and covered the shift to comfort care, a treatment summary, and advance directives. Timing and content were influenced by cancer type, disease status, and emotional state. Patients supported beginning GoC conversations early, but had different preferences for content of initial conversations. Some wanted complete information; others found this overwhelming. Patients felt intermediate GoC conversations should occur at decision points with time for processing. Content of intermediate and final conversations was dependent on patients' prognosis, questions, and treatment decisions. Conclusion. Although GoC conversations should follow individual patient preferences, our findings offer structure for their timing and content. (C) 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 896
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Reframing the Goals of Care Conversation: "We're in a Different Place" [J].
Back, Anthony L. ;
Trinidad, Susan B. ;
Hopley, Elizabeth K. ;
Edwards, Kelly A. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 17 (09) :1019-1024
[2]   Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices [J].
Bernacki, Rachelle E. ;
Block, Susan D. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (12) :1994-2003
[3]   REMAP: A Framework for Goals of Care Conversations [J].
Childers, Julie W. ;
Back, Anthony L. ;
Tulsky, James A. ;
Arnold, Robert M. .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2017, 13 (10) :700-+
[4]   Recommendations for Best Communication Practices to Facilitate Goal-concordant Care for Seriously Ill Older Patients With Emergency Surgical Conditions [J].
Cooper, Zara ;
Koritsanszky, Luca A. ;
Cauley, Christy E. ;
Frydman, Julia L. ;
Bernacki, Rachelle E. ;
Mosenthal, Anne C. ;
Gawande, Atul A. ;
Block, Susan D. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (01) :1-6
[5]   Strategies for effective goals of care discussions and decision-making: perspectives from a multi-centre survey of Canadian hospital-based healthcare providers [J].
des Ordons, Amanda L. Roze ;
Sharma, Nishan ;
Heyland, Daren K. ;
You, John J. .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 14
[6]   Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update [J].
Ferrell, Betty R. ;
Temel, Jennifer S. ;
Temin, Sarah ;
Alesi, Erin R. ;
Balboni, Tracy A. ;
Basch, Ethan M. ;
Firn, Janice I. ;
Paice, Judith A. ;
Peppercorn, Jeffrey M. ;
Phillips, Tanyanika ;
Stovall, Ellen L. ;
Zimmermann, Camilla ;
Smith, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (01) :96-+
[7]  
Field M.J., 1997, Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life
[8]   Oncologists' Strategies and Barriers to Effective Communication About the End of Life [J].
Granek, Leeat ;
Krzyzanowska, Monika K. ;
Tozer, Richard ;
Mazzotta, Paolo .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2013, 9 (04) :E129-E135
[9]  
KATZMAN R, 1983, AM J PSYCHIAT, V140, P734
[10]   A systematic review of Prognostic/End-of-Life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: Patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information [J].
Parker, Sharon M. ;
Clayton, Josephine M. ;
Hancock, Karen ;
Walder, Sharon ;
Butow, Phyllis N. ;
Carrick, Sue ;
Currow, David ;
Ghersi, Davina ;
Glare, Paul ;
Eth, Appl ;
Hagerty, Rebecca ;
Tattersall, Martin H. N. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 34 (01) :81-93