Incomplete Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy-Results of the Complete Adenoma Resection (CARE) Study

被引:630
作者
Pohl, Heiko [1 ,2 ]
Srivastava, Amitabh [3 ]
Bensen, Steve P. [2 ]
Anderson, Peter [2 ]
Rothstein, Richard I. [2 ]
Gordon, Stuart R. [2 ]
Levy, L. Campbell [2 ]
Toor, Arifa [2 ]
Mackenzie, Todd A. [4 ]
Rosch, Thomas [5 ]
Robertson, Douglas J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] VA Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, White River Jct, VT 05009 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Epidemiol & Biostat Sect, Dept Community & Family Med, Hanover, NH USA
[5] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Colon Cancer Screening; Early Detection; CRC; CARE Study; COLORECTAL-CANCER; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; CT COLONOGRAPHY; SURVEILLANCE; POPULATION; HISTOLOGY; DEATH;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.043
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although the adenoma detection rate is used as a measure of colonoscopy quality, there are limited data on the quality of endoscopic resection of detected adenomas. We determined the rate of incompletely resected neoplastic polyps in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a prospective study on 1427 patients who underwent colonoscopy at 2 medical centers and had at least 1 nonpedunculated polyp (5-20 mm). After polyp removal was considered complete macroscopically, biopsies were obtained from the resection margin. The main outcome was the percentage of incompletely resected neoplastic polyps (incomplete resection rate [IRR]) determined by the presence of neoplastic tissue in post-polypectomy biopsies. Associations between IRR and polyp size, morphology, histology, and endoscopist were assessed by regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 346 neoplastic polyps (269 patients; 84.0% men; mean age, 63.4 years) removed by 11 gastroenterologists, 10.1% were incompletely resected. IRR increased with polyp size and was significantly higher for large (10-20 mm) than small (5-9 mm) neoplastic polyps (17.3% vs 6.8%; relative risk = 2.1), and for sessile serrated adenomas/polyps than for conventional adenomas (31.0% vs 7.2%; relative risk = 3.7). The IRR for endoscopists with at least 20 polypectomies ranged from 6.5% to 22.7%; there was a 3.4-fold difference between the highest and lowest IRR after adjusting for size and sessile serrated histology. CONCLUSIONS: Neoplastic polyps are often incompletely resected, and the rate of incomplete resection varies broadly among endoscopists. Incomplete resection might contribute to the development of colon cancers after colonoscopy (interval cancers). Efforts are needed to ensure complete resection, especially of larger lesions. ClinicalTrials.govNumber: NCT01224444.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / U172
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] The Clinical Significance of Serrated Polyps
    Huang, Christopher S.
    Farraye, Francis A.
    Yang, Shi
    Brien, Michael J. O'
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (02) : 229 - 240
  • [12] The management of small polyps found by virtual colonoscopy: Results of a decision analysis
    Hur, Chin
    Chung, Daniel C.
    Schoen, Robert E.
    Gazelle, G. Scott
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (02) : 237 - 244
  • [13] Influence of long-term colonoscopic surveillance on incidence of colorectal cancer and death from the disease in patients with precursors (adenomas)
    Jorgensen, Ole Dan
    Kronborg, Ole
    Fenger, Claus
    Rasmussen, Morten
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2007, 46 (03) : 355 - 360
  • [14] Prevalence and Variable Detection of Proximal Colon Serrated Polyps During Screening Colonoscopy
    Kahi, Charles J.
    Hewett, David G.
    Norton, Dustin Lee
    Eckert, George J.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 9 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [15] Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study
    Leung, Keith
    Pinsky, Paul
    Laiyemo, Adeyinka O.
    Lanza, Elaine
    Schatzkin, Arthur
    Schoen, Robert E.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (01) : 111 - 117
  • [16] Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: Implications for CT colonography
    Lieberman, David
    Moravec, Matthew
    Holub, Jennifer
    Michaels, Leann
    Eisen, Glenn
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 135 (04) : 1100 - 1105
  • [17] Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium
    Lieberman, David A.
    Faigel, Douglas O.
    Logan, Judith R.
    Mattek, Nora
    Holub, Jennifer
    Eisen, Glenn
    Morris, Cynthia
    Smith, Robert
    Nadel, Marion
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (03) : 645 - 653
  • [18] Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial
    Pabby, A
    Schoen, RE
    Weissfeld, JL
    Burt, R
    Kikendall, JW
    Lance, P
    Shike, M
    Lanza, E
    Schatzkin, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) : 385 - 391
  • [19] Colorectal Cancers Detected After Colonoscopy Frequently Result From Missed Lesions
    Pohl, Heiko
    Robertson, Douglas J.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 8 (10) : 858 - 864
  • [20] Estimation of Impact of American College of Radiology Recommendations on CT Colonography Reporting for Resection of High-Risk Adenoma Findings
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Overhiser, Andrew J.
    Chen, Shawn C.
    Cummings, Oscar W.
    Ulbright, Thomas M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (01) : 149 - 153