Comparing empirical and model-based approaches for calculating dynamic grid emission factors: An application to CO2-minimizing storage dispatch in Germany

被引:26
作者
Braeuer, Fritz [1 ]
Finck, Rafael [1 ]
McKenna, Russell [2 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Ind Prod IIP, Chair Energy Econ, Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Energy Syst Anal, DTU Management, Lyngby, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Dynamic emission factors; Empirical emission factors; CO2-minimizing dispatch; Energy storage system; German industry; CO2; emissions; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; FLEXIBILITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121588
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As one possibility to increase flexibility, battery storage systems (BSS) will play a key role in the decarbonization of the energy system. The emissions-intensity of grid electricity becomes more important as these BSS5 are more widely employed. In this paper, we introduce a novel data basis for the determination of the energy system's CO2 emissions, which is a match between the ENTSO-E database and the EUTL databases. We further postulate four different dynamic emission factors (EF) to determine the hourly CO2 emissions caused through a change in electricity demand: the average emission factor (AEF), the marginal power mix (MPM), the marginal system response (MSR) and an energy-modelderived marginal power plant (MPP). For generic and battery storage systems, a linear optimization on two levels optimizes the economic and environmental storage dispatch for a set of 50 small and medium enterprises in Germany. The four different emission factors have different signaling effects. The AEF leads to the lowest CO2 reduction and allows for roughly two daily cycles. The other EFs show a higher volatility, which leads to a higher utilization of the storage system from 3.4 to 5.4 daily cycles. The minimum mean value for CO2 abatement costs over all 50 companies is 14.13(sic)/t(CO2). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Kintner-Meyer M., 2007, IMPACTS ASSESSMENT P
[22]   Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity [J].
Lund, Peter D. ;
Lindgren, Juuso ;
Mikkola, Jani ;
Salpakari, Jyri .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 45 :785-807
[23]  
Pareschi G., 2017, 1 E MOB POW SYST INT, DOI [10.3929/ETHZ-B-, DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-B-]
[24]   Dynamic simulation and techno-economic analysis of a concentrated solar power (CSP) plant hybridized with both thermal energy storage and natural gas [J].
Rashid, Khalid ;
Mohammadi, Kasra ;
Powell, Kody .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 248
[25]   Techno-economic evaluation of different hybridization schemes for a solar thermal/gas power plant [J].
Rashid, Khalid ;
Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa ;
Ellingwood, Kevin ;
Powell, Kody M. .
ENERGY, 2019, 181 :91-106
[26]  
Regett A, 2018, INT CONF EUR ENERG
[27]  
Ruppert M., 2020, INT S EN SYST OPT AD, P81
[28]   Decision Support Algorithm for Evaluating Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Electricity Generation in the United States [J].
Ryan, Nicole A. ;
Johnson, Jeremiah X. ;
Keoleian, Gregory A. ;
Lewis, Geoffrey M. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (06) :1318-1330
[29]   Increasing Precision in Greenhouse Gas Accounting Using Real-Time Emission Factors: A Case Study of Electricity in Spain [J].
Spork, Charlie C. ;
Chavez, Abel ;
Gabarrell Durany, Xavier ;
Patel, Martin K. ;
Villalba Mendez, Gara .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 19 (03) :380-390
[30]   Environmental and energy implications of plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles [J].
Stephan, Craig H. ;
Sullivan, John .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (04) :1185-1190