Assessment of domino effects in the coal gasification process using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Bayesian Network

被引:14
作者
Zhao, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Zhi-rong [1 ]
Song, Ze-yang [1 ]
Guo, Pin-kun [1 ]
Cao, Xing-yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Safety Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Domino effects; Coal gasification process; Escalation probability; Sensitive analysis; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DUST EXPLOSIONS; SAFETY ANALYSIS; PROCESS SYSTEMS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; TREE; UNCERTAINTY; MODEL; FAULT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104888
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Domino effects in process facilities can lead to catastrophic consequences. Many previous models devoted to assessing domino effects, but the influence of the combination of heat radiation, overpressure and fragment on the escalation is not considered. In addition, although the quantity of dangerous substances stored in the affected unit has a non-negligible effect on the propagation of domino effects, their inclusion in the modeling of domino effects has hardly been taken into account. To address these challenges, in this work, using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the escalation of domino effects under multiple physical factors is assessed, while considering other factors in varying degrees such as meteorological, mitigation measures and the affected units. Finally, the conditional probability table (CPT) in Bayesian networks (BNs) is updated by the FAHP. The application of the methodology has been demonstrated using an illustrative case study; the comparison of the results with that of previous study illustrates the efficacy and practicality of the development methodology. This work will be beneficial for land-use planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry
    Abdolhamidzadeh, Bahman
    Abbasi, Tasneem
    Rashtchian, D.
    Abbasi, S. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 182 (1-3) : 416 - 426
  • [2] Assessment of domino effect: State of the art and research Needs
    Amos, Necci
    Cozzani, Valerio
    Spadoni, Gigliola
    Khan, Faisal
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 143 : 3 - 18
  • [3] Bosch C. J. H. V. D., 1997, ENV TOXICOL CHEM, V4, P587
  • [4] Dynamic vulnerability assessment of process plants with respect to vapor cloud explosions
    Chen, Chao
    Khakzad, Nima
    Reniers, Genserik
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 200
  • [5] A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries
    Chen, Chao
    Reniers, Genserik
    Khakzad, Nima
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 125
  • [6] Cost-benefit management of intentional domino effects in chemical industrial areas
    Chen, Chao
    Reniers, Genserik
    Khakzad, Nima
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2020, 134 (392-405) : 392 - 405
  • [7] Integrating safety and security resources to protect chemical industrial parks from man-made domino effects: A dynamic graph approach
    Chen, Chao
    Reniers, Genserik
    Khakzad, Nima
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
  • [8] CHEN SJ, 1992, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V375, P1
  • [9] Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis
    Clemen, RT
    Winkler, RL
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (02) : 187 - 203
  • [10] Sensitivity analysis:: an aid for belief-network quantification
    Coupé, VMH
    Van der Gaag, LC
    Habbema, JDF
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2000, 15 (03) : 215 - 232