Mobility prediction for unmanned ground vehicles in uncertain environments

被引:2
|
作者
Kewlani, Gaurav [1 ]
Iagnemma, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Robot Mobil Grp, Cambridge, MA USA
来源
关键词
homogeneous chaos; Monte Carlo; Latin hypercube sampling; vehicle mobility; vehicle rollover; stochastic response surface; terrain modeling; unmanned ground vehicle; wheel-soil interaction;
D O I
10.1117/12.782222
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The ability of autonomous unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) to rapidly and effectively predict terrain negotiability is a critical requirement for their use on challenging terrain. Most methods for assessing traversability, however, assume precise knowledge of vehicle and terrain properties. In practical applications, uncertainties are associated with the estimation of the vehicle/terrain parameters, and these uncertainties must be considered while determining vehicular mobility. Here a computationally inexpensive method for efficient mobility prediction based on the stochastic response surface (SRSM) approach is presented that considers imprecise knowledge of terrain and vehicle parameters while analyzing various metrics associated with UGV mobility. A conventional Monte Carlo method and the proposed response surface methodology have been applied to two simulated cases of mobility analysis, and it has been shown that the SRSM method is an efficient tool as compared to conventional Monte Carlo methods for the analysis of vehicular mobility in uncertain environments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Global Path Planning Method for Unmanned Ground Vehicles in Off-Road Environments Based on Mobility Prediction
    Hua, Chen
    Niu, Runxin
    Yu, Biao
    Zheng, Xiaokun
    Bai, Rengui
    Zhang, Song
    MACHINES, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [2] Double Neural Networks Enhanced Global Mobility Prediction Model for Unmanned Ground Vehicles in Off-Road Environments
    Hua, Chen
    Jiang, Chunmao
    Niu, Runxin
    Fu, Xuhui
    Chen, Ziyu
    Kuang, Xinkai
    Yu, Biao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 73 (06) : 7547 - 7560
  • [3] Mission Energy Prediction for Unmanned Ground Vehicles
    Sadrpour, Amir
    Jin, J.
    Ulsoy, A. G.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2012, : 2229 - 2234
  • [4] Towards solving the mobility issues of unmanned ground vehicles
    Odedra, Siddharth
    Prior, Stephen D.
    Karamanoglu, Mehmet
    UNMANNED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY IX, 2007, 6561
  • [5] Path planning for unmanned aerial vehicles in uncertain and adversarial environments
    Jun, M
    D'Andrea, R
    COOPERATIVE CONTROL: MODELS, APPLICATIONS AND ALGORITHMS, 2003, 1 : 95 - 110
  • [6] A history and overview of mobility modeling for autonomous unmanned ground vehicles
    Durst, Phillip J.
    Monroe, Gabe
    Bethel, Cindy L.
    Anderson, Derek T.
    Carruth, Daniel W.
    AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS: SENSORS, VEHICLES, SECURITY, AND THE INTERNET OF EVERYTHING, 2018, 10643
  • [7] Evaluating mobility vs. latency in unmanned ground vehicles
    Gorsich, David J.
    Jayakumar, Paramsothy
    Cole, Michael P.
    Crean, Cory M.
    Jain, Abhinandan
    Ersal, Tulga
    JOURNAL OF TERRAMECHANICS, 2018, 80 : 11 - 19
  • [8] Control and learning for intelligent mobility of unmanned ground vehicles in complex terrains
    Trentini, M
    Beckman, B
    Digney, B
    Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, 2005, 5804 : 203 - 216
  • [9] Emergency Communication in Challenged Environments via Unmanned Ground and Aerial Vehicles
    Baumgaertner, Lars
    Kohlbrecher, Stefan
    Euler, Juliane
    Ritter, Tobias
    Stute, Milan
    Meurisch, Christian
    Muehlhaeuser, Max
    Hollick, Matthias
    von Stryk, Oskar
    Freisleben, Bernd
    2017 IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (GHTC), 2017, : 713 - 721
  • [10] Situational awareness for unmanned ground vehicles in semi-structured environments
    Goodsell, TG
    Snorrason, M
    Stevens, MR
    UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY IV, 2002, 4715 : 178 - 188