Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicines and Western Medicines for Treating Diabetes Mellitus with Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Wei-Wei [1 ]
Guo, Hao [2 ]
Li, Hong-Hao [3 ]
Wang, Lin-Lin [1 ]
Fu, Hong [1 ]
Wang, Xue-Mei [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Inst Integrated Chinese & Western Med, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Minist Educ, Key Lab Pharmacol Tradit Chinese Med Formulae, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Agr Univ, Lib Hunan Agr Univ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
QUALITY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1089/acm.2012.0568
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Purpose: Diabetes mellitus with coronary heart disease (DM with CHD) poses a health challenge to people in China and elsewhere in the world. In Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), DM with CHD is classified as a type of disease called Xiaoke and Xiongbi. In Asia, TCM has been used to treat Xiaoke and Xiongbi conditions for centuries, especially in China. In this study, it was evaluated whether integrated strategies incorporating both TCM and Western medicines (iTCWM) could improve the curative efficacy of DM with CHD. Methods: An extensive search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to November 2011 in either English or Chinese about iTCWM for DM with CHD was conducted. All listings in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and the Wanfang database were included in the literature search. The quality of each trial was assessed using the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 5.0. Data analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.0 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Results: After an initial selection of 207 articles, 21 RCTs and quasi-RCTs were ultimately included in the analysis for this study. All of these trials were conducted in China and published in Chinese journals. The methodological quality of the trials was low in most studies. Selection bias and measurement bias were common in all of the studies. A meta-analysis was not conducted, due to the poor quality of the available studies. Conclusions: The current state of the literature regarding the utility of iTCWM for the treatment of DM with CHD is inadequate. The poor quality of the available trials makes it difficult to draw any conclusions regarding the efficacy of iTCWM for the treatment of DM with CHD. This study highlights the paucity of reliable clinical evidence for iTCWM and the need for higher quality RCTs to be conducted in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 500
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Dose-response association of diabetic kidney disease with routine clinical parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Jianbo
    Liu, Chen
    Wang, Yifan
    Shao, Baoyi
    Fong, Tung Leong
    Lau, Ngai Chung
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Haidi
    Wang, Jianan
    Lu, Xinyu
    Wang, Anqi
    Leung, Cheuk Lung
    Chia, Xin Wei
    Li, Fei
    Meng, Xiaoming
    He, Qingyong
    Chen, Haiyong
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 69
  • [42] The Risk for New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Vijayvargiya, Priya
    Anthanont, Pimjai
    Erickson, Stephen B.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2016, 40 (06) : 521 - 528
  • [43] Coronary artery bypass surgery plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for ischaemic heart disease: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Lorenzen, Ulver Spangsberg
    Buggeskov, Katrine Bredahl
    Nielsen, Emil Eik
    Sethi, Naqash Javaid
    Carranza, Christian Lildal
    Gluud, Christian
    Jakobsen, Janus Christian
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)