Criteria for radiological assessment of therapy response. Criteria-based appraisal

被引:0
|
作者
D'Anastasi, M. [1 ]
Schramm, N. A. [1 ]
Reiser, M. F. [1 ]
Graser, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Klin Radiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
RADIOLOGE | 2013年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
Oncologic imaging; Clinical studies; RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors); Systemic tumor therapy; Neoplastic cells; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; IMATINIB MESYLATE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PHASE-II; RECIST; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROPOSAL; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00117-012-2435-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Oncologic imaging and reporting are an important part of clinical trials and have to be performed according to standardized criteria that clearly define how certain changes in the size and number of tumorous lesions have to be rated. Knowledge of these criteria is not only crucial when interpreting cases for a clinical trial but may also be used as guidelines for everyday clinical reporting as they aid decision making and can increase the validity of radiologic reporting. This article summarizes the most important and frequently used criteria: the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria which are only used in solid malignancies, the Choi criteria that have been designed for the assessment of gastrointestinal stroma tumors (GIST), and the Cheson criteria that are applied to malignant lymphomas. The compilation of these criteria is designed to be used as a repetitorium for experts and can also serve as training guidelines for junior radiologists who want to become involved in clinical trial reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 328
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patterns of response to anti-PD-1 treatment: an exploratory comparison of four radiological response criteria and associations with overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients
    Khoja, Leila
    Kibiro, Minnie
    Metser, Ur
    Gedye, Craig
    Hogg, David
    Butler, Marcus O.
    Atenafu, Eshetu G.
    Joshua, Anthony M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (10) : 1186 - 1192
  • [42] Monitoring neoadjuvant treatment-induced surgical benefit in GIST patients using CT-based radiological criteria
    Weeda, Ylva A.
    Kalisvaart, Gijsbert M.
    Hartgrink, Henk H.
    van der Molen, Aart J.
    Gelderblom, Hans
    Bovee, Judith V. M. G.
    de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
    Grootjans, Willem
    van der Hage, Jos A.
    SURGERY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 20 : 169 - 177
  • [43] Circulating tumor cells criteria (CyCAR) versus standard RECIST criteria for treatment response assessment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
    Mayte Delgado-Ureña
    Francisco G. Ortega
    Diego de Miguel-Pérez
    Alba Rodriguez-Martínez
    Jose L. García-Puche
    Hugh Ilyine
    Jose A. Lorente
    Jose Exposito-Hernandez
    M. Carmen Garrido-Navas
    Miguel Delgado-Ramirez
    M. José Serrano
    Journal of Translational Medicine, 16
  • [44] Translation in solid cancer: are size‐based response criteria an anachronism?
    M. Fernandes
    D. Rosel
    J. Brábek
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2015, 17 : 1 - 10
  • [45] Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
    Han, Jixia
    Song, Qi
    Guo, Feng
    Du, Rui
    Fang, Henghu
    Kang, Jingbo
    Lu, Zejun
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 43 (06) : 717 - 724
  • [46] ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF VARIOUS CRITERIA FOR LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK WITH THE RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE
    Kuznetsov, V. A.
    Malishevskii, L. M.
    Todosiychuk, V. V.
    Soldatova, A. M.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2020, 60 (07) : 78 - 85
  • [47] Response Assessment in Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma: Can Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Replace Three-dimensional Volume Assessments?
    Schoot, Reineke A.
    McHugh, Kieran
    van Rijn, Rick R.
    Kremer, Leontien C. M.
    Chisholm, Julia C.
    Caron, Huib N.
    Merks, Johannes H. M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (03) : 870 - 878
  • [48] Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma Cancer
    Takada J.
    Hidaka H.
    Nakazawa T.
    Kondo M.
    Numata K.
    Tanaka K.
    Matsunaga K.
    Okuse C.
    Kobayashi S.
    Morimoto M.
    Ohkawa S.
    Koizumi W.
    BMC Research Notes, 8 (1)
  • [49] Survival prediction model of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma based on clinical and radiological criteria
    Jansen, Marc H.
    van Zanten, Sophie E. Veldhuijzen
    Aliaga, Esther Sanchez
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    Warmuth-Metz, Monika
    Hargrave, Darren
    van der Hoeven, Erica J.
    Gidding, Corrie E.
    de Bont, Eveline S.
    Eshghi, Omid S.
    Reddingius, Roel
    Peeters, Cache M.
    Schouten-van Meeteren, Antoinette Y. N.
    Gooskens, Rob H. J.
    Granzen, Bernd
    Paardekooper, Gabriel M.
    Janssens, Geert O.
    Noske, David P.
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Kramm, Christof M.
    Vandertop, W. Peter
    Kaspers, Gertjan J.
    van Vuurden, Dennis G.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 17 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [50] Assessment of eligibility criteria in renal cell carcinoma trials evaluating systemic therapy
    Castro, Daniela
    Prajapati, Sweta
    Feng, Matthew
    Chan, Elyse
    Lee, Kyle
    Paul, Trishita
    Sehgal, Ishaan
    Patel, Jalen
    Li, Xiaochen
    Zengin, Zeynep
    Ebrahimi, Hedyeh
    Govindarajan, Ameish
    Meza, Luis
    Mercier, Benjamin
    Chawla, Neal
    Dizman, Nazli
    Philip, Errol
    Hsu, Joann
    Bergerot, Cristiane
    Chehrazi-Raffle, Alex
    Rock, Adam
    Liu, Sandy
    Tripathi, Abhishek
    Dorff, Tanya
    Pal, Sumanta
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (03) : 297 - 304