Three-Arm Noninferiority Trials with a Prespecified Margin for Inference of the Difference in the Proportions of Binary Endpoints

被引:12
作者
Hida, Eisuke [1 ]
Tango, Toshiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Technol Assessment & Biostat, Wako, Saitama 3510197, Japan
[2] Ctr Med Stat, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Assay sensitivity; Binary endpoint; Optimal allocation; Prespecified noninferiority margin; Three-arm noninferiority; NON-INFERIORITY TRIALS; GOLD STANDARD DESIGN; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2013.789893
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The design of a three-arm trial including the experimental treatment, an active reference treatment, and a placebo is recommended as a useful approach to the assessment of noninferiority of the experimental treatment. The inclusion of the placebo arm enables the assessment of assay sensitivity and internal validation, in addition to testing the noninferiority of the experimental treatment to the reference. Generally, the acceptable noninferiority margin has been defined as the maximum clinically irrelevant difference between treatments in many two-arm noninferiority trials. However, many articles have considered a design in which the noninferiority margin is relatively defined as a prespecified fraction f of the unknown effect size of the reference treatment. Therefore, these methods cannot be applied to cases where the margin is defined as a prespecified difference between treatments. In this article, we propose score-based statistical procedures for a three-arm noninferiority trial with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints. In addition, we derive the approximate sample size and optimal allocation to minimize the total sample size and that of the placebo arm. A randomized controlled trial on major depressive disorder based on the difference in the proportions of remission is used to demonstrate our proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 789
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues - the encounters of academic consultants in statistics [J].
D'Agostino, RB ;
Massaro, JM ;
Sullivan, LM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (02) :169-186
[2]  
European Medicines Agency, 2005, Doc. Ref. EMEA/CPMP/EWP/2158/99
[3]   TEST STATISTICS AND SAMPLE-SIZE FORMULAS FOR COMPARATIVE BINOMIAL TRIALS WITH NULL HYPOTHESIS OF NONZERO RISK DIFFERENCE OR NON-UNITY RELATIVE RISK [J].
FARRINGTON, CP ;
MANNING, G .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (12) :1447-1454
[4]   Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm trial in the presence of heteroscedasticity [J].
Hasler, Mario ;
Vonk, Richardus ;
Hothorn, Ludwig A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (04) :490-503
[5]   On the three-arm non-inferiority trial including a placebo with a prespecified margin [J].
Hida, Eisuke ;
Tango, Toshiro .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (03) :224-231
[6]  
Higuchi T., 2009, JPN J CLIN PSYCHOPHA, V12, P1613
[7]  
ICH, 2011, HARM TRIP GUID CHOIC
[8]  
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), 1998, HARM TRIP GUID STAT
[9]   Planning and analysis of three-arm non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints [J].
Kieser, Meinhard ;
Friede, Tim .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (02) :253-273
[10]  
Koch Armin, 2004, J Biopharm Stat, V14, P315