Dynamic Airspace Configuration Using Approximate Dynamic Programming Intelligence-Based Paradigm

被引:4
作者
Kulkarni, Sameer [1 ]
Ganesan, Rajesh [2 ]
Sherry, Lance [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Ctr Air Transportat Syst Res, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Syst Engn & Operat Res, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Air traffic control - Air transportation - Aviation;
D O I
10.3141/2266-04
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
On the basis of weather and high traffic, the Next Generation Air Transportation System envisions an airspace that is adaptable, flexible, controller friendly, and dynamic. Sector geometries, developed with average traffic patterns, have remained structurally static with occasional changes in geometry due to limited forming of sectors. Dynamic airspace configuration aims at migrating from a rigid to a more flexible airspace structure. Efficient management of airspace capacity is important to ensure safe and systematic operation of the U.S. National Airspace System and maximum benefit to stakeholders. The primary initiative is to strike a balance between airspace capacity and air traffic demand. Imbalances in capacity and demand are resolved by initiatives such as the ground delay program and rerouting, often resulting in systemwide delays. This paper, a proof of concept for the dynamic programming approach to dynamic airspace configuration by static forming of sectors, addresses static forming of sectors by partitioning airspace according to controller workload. The paper applies the dynamic programming technique to generate sectors in the Fort Worth, Texas, Air Route Traffic Control Center; compares it with current sectors; and lays a foundation for future work. Initial results of the dynamic programming methodology are promising in terms of sector shapes and the number of sectors that are comparable to current operations.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Neural-net-based direct self-tuning control of nonlinear plants [J].
Ahmed, MS ;
Anjum, MF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1997, 66 (01) :85-104
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, LINEAR MULTIVARIABLE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Simulation-Based Optimization: Parametric Optimization Tech- niques Reinforcement Learning
[4]  
Baras JS, 1995, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 34TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, P2302, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1995.480546
[5]   A FORWARD METHOD FOR OPTIMAL STOCHASTIC NONLINEAR AND ADAPTIVE-CONTROL [J].
BAYARD, DS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1991, 36 (09) :1046-1053
[6]   THE THEORY OF DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING [J].
BELLMAN, R .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 1954, 60 (06) :503-515
[7]  
Bertsekas D. P., 1995, NEURODYNAMIC PROGRAM
[8]  
Bloem M., 2009, Air Traffic Control Quarterly, V17, P245, DOI DOI 10.2514/atcq.17.3.245
[9]  
Brinton C., 2008, 27 DIG AV SYST C SAI
[10]  
DELAHAYE D, 1998, P IEEE INT C EV COMP