Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy

被引:242
作者
Jugert, Philipp [1 ]
Greenaway, Katharine H. [2 ]
Barth, Markus [1 ]
Buechner, Ronja [1 ,2 ]
Eisentraut, Sarah [1 ]
Fritsche, Immo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Psychol, Neumarkt 9-19, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Collective efficacy; Self-efficacy; Climate change; Pro-environmental behavior; Social identity; COGNITIVE THEORY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MODEL; IDENTITY; BELIEFS; EMPOWERMENT; SALIENCE; BEHAVIOR; THREAT; LINK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We discuss prior findings that enhancing perceptions of collective efficacy encourages pro environmental behavior. We suggest that collective efficacy manipulations affect pro-environmental intentions through increasing both collective and self-efficacy. Four experiments conducted in Germany and Australia demonstrated that collective efficacy manipulations can increase pro-environmental intentions by increasing the perception that one's group and, through this, the self is capable of effecting change. We also provide evidence that collective efficacy manipulations only work when they simultaneously raise self-efficacy. Our findings contribute to the environmental literature by showing the mechanisms through which group efficacy appeals work. Our findings also support theorizing on group based control by showing that personal control can be derived from group sources. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 23
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Effect Size Measures for Mediation Models: Quantitative Strategies for Communicating Indirect Effects
    Preacher, Kristopher J.
    Kelley, Ken
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (02) : 93 - 115
  • [32] Collective self and individual choice: The effects of inter-group comparative context on environmental values and behaviour
    Rabinovich, Anna
    Morton, Thomas A.
    Postmes, Tom
    Verplanken, Bas
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 51 (04) : 551 - 569
  • [33] Sinning Saints and Saintly Sinners: The Paradox of Moral Self-Regulation
    Sachdeva, Sonya
    Iliev, Rumen
    Medin, Douglas L.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) : 523 - 528
  • [34] Cross-Cultural Evidence for Spatial Bias in Beliefs About the Severity of Environmental Problems
    Schultz, P. Wesley
    Milfont, Taciano L.
    Chance, Randie C.
    Tronu, Giuseppe
    Luis, Silvia
    Ando, Kaori
    Rasool, Faiz
    Linera Roose, Pamela
    Ogunbode, Charles Adedayo
    Castro, Juana
    Gouveia, Valdiney V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2014, 46 (03) : 267 - 302
  • [35] A guide to constructs of control
    Skinner, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (03) : 549 - 570
  • [36] Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations
    Spence, Alexa
    Pidgeon, Nick
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (04): : 656 - 667
  • [37] Stephanou G., 2013, Psychology, V4, P268, DOI [10.4236/psych.2013.43A040, DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2013.43A040]
  • [38] Striving for group agency: threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups
    Stollberg, Janine
    Fritsche, Immo
    Baecker, Anna
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [39] Tajfel H., 1979, The social psychology of intergroup relations, P33, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
  • [40] Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia
    Tranter, Bruce
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2011, 20 (01) : 78 - 96