Tying and freebies in two-sided markets

被引:70
作者
Amelio, Andrea [2 ]
Jullien, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Sch Econ GREMAQ&IDEI, Toulouse, France
[2] Toulouse Sch Econ GREMAQ, Toulouse, France
关键词
Tying; Two-sided market; Platform competition; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.03.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In two-sided markets where platforms are constrained to set non-negative prices, tying can be deployed by platforms as a tool to introduce implicit subsidies. For a monopoly, this raises participation and benefits consumers on both sides. In a duopoly, tying on one side makes a platform more or less competitive on the other side depending on externalities. Tying may not be ex-ante optimal while the competing platform may benefit from it. The impact on consumers' surplus depends on whether competition is softened or intensified on the profitable side. Moreover tying increases total welfare if network effects are strong. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 446
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   COMMODITY BUNDLING AND BURDEN OF MONOPOLY [J].
ADAMS, WJ ;
YELLEN, JL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 90 (03) :475-498
[2]  
Amelio A, 2007, 445 IDEI
[3]   Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts [J].
Armstrong, Mark ;
Wright, Julian .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 32 (02) :353-380
[4]   Competition in two-sided markets [J].
Armstrong, Mark .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) :668-691
[5]   Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers [J].
Caillaud, B ;
Jullien, B .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 34 (02) :309-328
[6]   TYING IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS WITH MULTI-HOMING [J].
Choi, Jay Pil .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 58 (03) :607-626
[7]  
Evans D.S., 2003, REV NETW ECON, V2, P1, DOI [10.2202/1446-9022.1026, DOI 10.2202/1446-9022.1026]
[8]  
Evans DavidS., 2003, YALE J REGULATION, V20, P325
[9]  
Farhi E., 2008, Strategic interactions in two-sided market oligopolies
[10]   Two-sided markets and electronic intermediaries [J].
Jullien, B .
CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 51 (2-3) :233-260