Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device

被引:68
作者
Bekar, A. [1 ]
Dogan, S. [1 ]
Abas, F. [1 ]
Caner, B. [1 ]
Korfali, G. [2 ]
Kocaeli, H. [1 ]
Yilmazlar, S. [1 ]
Korfali, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia & Reanimat, TR-16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
关键词
Complications; Fiberoptic device; Intracranial pressure; Monitoring; BRAIN-TISSUE PRESSURE; HEAD-INJURED PATIENTS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; AGGRESSIVE TREATMENT; EXPERIENCE; DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2008.02.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We prospectively investigated the complications associated with intraparenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring using the Camino intracranial pressure device. A fiberoptic ICP monitoring transducer was implanted in 631 patients. About half of the patients (n = 303) also received an external ventricular drainage set (EVDS). The durations (mean +/- SD) of ICP monitoring in patients without and with an EVDS were 6.5 +/- 4.4 and 7.3 +/- 5.1 days, respectively. Infection occurred in 6 patients with only an ICP transducer (6/328, 1.8%) and 24 patients with an EVDS also (24/303, 7.9%). The duration of monitoring had no effect on infection, whereas the use of an EVDS for more than 9 days increased infection risk by 5.11 times. Other complications included transducer disconnection (2.37%), epidural hematoma (0.47%), contusion (0.47%), defective probe (0.31%), broken transducer (0.31%), dislocation of the fixation screw (0.15%), and intraparenchymal hematoma (0.15%). In conclusion, intraparenchymal ICP monitoring systems can be safely used in patients who either have, or are at risk of developing, increased ICP. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 240
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] KANTNER MJ, 1991, NEUROSURG CLIN N AM, V2, P252
  • [22] Lang E W, 1994, Neurosurg Clin N Am, V5, P573
  • [23] LUNDBERG N, 1960, Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, V36, P1
  • [24] OUTCOME WITH AGGRESSIVE TREATMENT IN SEVERE HEAD-INJURIES .1. SIGNIFICANCE OF INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING
    MARSHALL, LF
    SMITH, RW
    SHAPIRO, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1979, 50 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [25] Martínez-Mañas RM, 1999, NEUROCIRUGIA, V10, P291
  • [26] VENTRICULOSTOMY-RELATED INFECTIONS - A PROSPECTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGIC-STUDY
    MAYHALL, CG
    ARCHER, NH
    LAMB, VA
    SPADORA, AC
    BAGGETT, JW
    WARD, JD
    NARAYAN, RK
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (09) : 553 - 559
  • [27] INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING IN REYE-JOHNSON SYNDROME
    MICKELL, JJ
    COOK, DR
    REIGEL, DH
    PAINTER, MJ
    SAFAR, P
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1976, 4 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [28] Miller J D., 1989, INTRACRANIAL PRESSUR, P5
  • [29] The CAMINO intracranial pressure device in clinical practice:: Reliability, handling characteristics and complications
    Münch, E
    Weigel, R
    Schmiedek, P
    Schürer, L
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1998, 140 (11) : 1113 - +
  • [30] COMPARISON AMONG 3 METHODS OF INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE RECORDING
    NORTH, B
    REILLY, P
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1986, 18 (06) : 730 - 732