Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study

被引:35
作者
Wang, Q. [1 ]
Ma, H. [1 ]
Peng, H. [1 ]
He, L. [1 ]
Bian, C. [1 ]
Zhao, X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Caesarean scar pregnancy; Suction evacuation; Haemorrhage; Risk factors; Scoring system; METHOTREXATE; CURETTAGE; DILATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate risk factors associated with excessive intra-operative haemorrhage during evacuation operation, and to develop a bleeding risk scoring system in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) to guide treatment. Study design: A case-control study was conducted. Excessive intra-operative haemorrhage was defined as active bleeding during dilation and suction evacuation (blood loss >= 200 ml). The bleeding group consisted of patients who experienced excessive intra-operative blood loss. Patients with less intraoperative blood loss were included in the control group. Results: In total, 458 admissions from 2009 to 2014 were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the bleeding group had higher serum beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), higher gestational age, larger CSP mass, richer peritrophoblastic perfusion and thinner myometrial layer before evacuation (all p < 0.05). Risk factors with p < 0.05 on multivariable logistic regression analysis included serum beta-hCG >20,000 mIU/ml [odds ratio (OR) 1.4,95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.2], gestational age >8 weeks (OR 2.1,95% CI 1.1-4.0), maximum diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass >= 5 cm (OR 7.4,95% CI 3.4-16.1), myometrial thickness <= 0.15 cm (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.9) and significant peritrophoblastic perfusion (OR 9.8, 95% CI 4.1-23.2). These risk factors formed the final bleeding risk scoring system by conversion of their OR values into corresponding points. A total of 10 points was identified as the optimal cut-off on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Thus, patients with scores >= 10 points were identified as being at high risk of bleeding. The final bleeding risk scoring system had an area under the curve of 0.86, sensitivity of 86.8% and specificity of 73.2%. Conclusions: Gestational age, serum beta-hCG, size of gestational sac, thickness of myometrial layer and peritrophoblastic perfusion were found to be associated with excessive intra-operative haemorrhage during suction evacuation of CSP. A bleeding risk scoring system was constructed to help guide the management of patients with CSP. Patients with total scores >= 10 points were identified as being at high risk of bleeding, whereas patients with total scores <= 5 points were identified as being at low risk of bleeding. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 145
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   DOPPLER ULTRASOUND COLOR FLOW IMAGING IN THE STUDY OF BREAST-CANCER - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS [J].
ADLER, DD ;
CARSON, PL ;
RUBIN, JM ;
QUINNREID, D .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (06) :553-559
[2]   Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: A review. [J].
Fylstra, DL .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2002, 57 (08) :537-543
[3]   Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Gao, LvFen ;
Huang, Zhongwei ;
Gao, Jie ;
Mai, Haoshan ;
Zhang, Yiting ;
Wang, Xiaoyu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 127 (02) :147-151
[4]   Bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization combined with dilation and curettage for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: A method for preserving the uterus [J].
Lan, Weishun ;
Hu, Daoyu ;
Li, Zhen ;
Wang, Liang ;
Yang, Wenzhong ;
Hu, Shan .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (06) :1153-1158
[5]  
LARSEN JV, 1978, S AFR MED J, V53, P142
[6]   Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies - Etiology, diagnosis, and management [J].
Rotas, Michael A. ;
Haberman, Shoshana ;
Levgur, Michael .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (06) :1373-1381
[7]   Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review [J].
Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E. ;
Monteagudo, Ana .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (01) :14-29
[8]   Laparoscopic Management or Laparoscopy Combined with Transvaginal Management of Type II Cesarean Scar Pregnancy [J].
Wang, Huan-Ying ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Li, Yan-Na ;
Wei, Wei ;
Zhang, Da-Wei ;
Lu, Yu-Qiu ;
Zhang, Hao-Feng .
JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (02) :263-272
[9]   Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization [J].
Wang, Jian-Hua ;
Qian, Zhi-Da ;
Zhuang, Ya-Ling ;
Du, Yong-Jiang ;
Zhu, Lin-Hua ;
Huang, Li-Li .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 123 (03) :240-243
[10]   Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Yang, X-Y ;
Yu, H. ;
Li, K-M ;
Chu, Y-X ;
Zheng, A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (08) :990-996