Can the Prognosis of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Be Predicted by Gated SPECT?

被引:1
作者
Qin, Shengmei [1 ]
Shi, Hongcheng [2 ]
Su, Yangang [1 ]
Chen, Shuguang [2 ]
Pan, Wenzhi [1 ]
Ge, Junbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MYOCARDIAL-PERFUSION SPECT; LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSSYNCHRONY; EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HEART-FAILURE; PHASE-ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; TISSUE; COLLABORATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000000912
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) phase parameters (phase SD and histogram bandwidth) in predicting the short-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as left ventricle (LV) remodeling and the long-term effect as all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation and hospitalization for heart failure. Patients and Methods This prospective observational study included 63 consecutive patients undergoing CRT from May 2008 to April 2014. Before CRT, patients underwent evaluation of New York Heart Association functional class, standard 12-lead ECG, Tc-99m-MIBI GMPS, and 2-dimensional echocardiography. The patients were grouped according to complete left bundle-branch block (CLBBB). Follow-up was done every 6 months after pacemaker implantation. The short-term end point was reverse LV remodeling in 6 to 12 months follow-up, and the long-term primary end point was all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation. The secondary end point was hospitalization for heart failure. Results Reverse LV remodeling showed in 60.9% (39/63) patients (74.5% CLBBB [35/47] vs 25.0% non-CLBBB [4/16], P < 0.001). Phase SD less than 55 degrees, CLBBB, and left atrium diameter were independent predictive factors for reverse LV remodeling. At a median follow-up of 39.76 months, there were 17 deaths and 2 transplantations (17.0% CLBBB vs 68.8% non-CLBBB, P < 0.001). Seventeen patients required hospitalization more than once for heart failure, and 2 underwent heart transplantation (14.9% CLBBB vs 62.5% non-CLBBB, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that only CLBBB was an independent predictive factor for both end points. Conclusions The GMPS parameters were not independent predictive factors for all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation and hospitalization for heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 792
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey: Reflections from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II
    Kocyigit, Duygu
    Sarigul, Nedim Umutay
    Altin, Ali Timucin
    Cay, Serkan
    Polat, Veli
    Saygi, Serkan
    Gumrukcuoglu, Hasan Ali
    Gemici, Kani
    Ikitimur, Baris
    Akyol, Ahmet
    Bilge, Ahmet Kaya
    Basarici, Ibrahim
    Ozcan, Emin Evren
    Demir, Mesut
    Kabul, Hasan Kutsi
    Ornek, Ender
    Normand, Camilla
    Linde, Cecilia
    Dickstein, Kenneth
    [J]. ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 24 (06) : 382 - 396
  • [42] Echocardiography and Noninvasive Imaging in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Results of the PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) Study in Perspective
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Gorcsan, John, III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (21) : 1933 - 1943
  • [43] Impact on long-term cardiovascular outcomes of different cardiac resynchronization therapy response criteria
    Rodrigues, Ines
    Abreu, Ana
    Oliveira, Mario
    Cunha, Pedro S.
    Santa Clara, Helena
    Osorio, Paulo
    Lousinha, Ana
    Valente, Bruno
    Portugal, Guilherme
    Rio, Pedro
    Morais, Luis A.
    Santos, Vanessa
    Carmo, Miguel M.
    Ferreira, Rui C.
    [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 37 (12) : 961 - 969
  • [44] Atrial high-rate episodes predict clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Jacobsson, Jonatan
    Platonov, Pyotr G.
    Reitan, Christian
    Carlsson, Jonas
    Borgquist, Rasmus
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2017, 51 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [45] A Patient Selection Score for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Shen, Xuedong
    Nair, Chandra K.
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    Hee, Tom
    Pasupuleti, Suman
    Holmberg, Mark J.
    Wang, Fenwei
    Esterbrooks, Dennis J.
    [J]. ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2011, 28 (02): : 188 - 195
  • [46] Predictors of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Rinkuniene, Diana
    Bucyte, Silvija
    Ceseviciute, Kristina
    Abramavicius, Silvijus
    Baronaite-Dudoniene, Kristina
    Laukaitiene, Jolanta
    Kazakevicius, Tomas
    Zabiela, Vytautas
    Sileikis, Vytautas
    Puodziukynas, Aras
    Jurkevicius, Renaldas
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2014, 14
  • [47] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Narrow QRS
    Chapurnykh, A. V.
    Mochalova, O. V.
    Solovieva, N. V.
    Ryabov, A. S.
    Soloviev, O. V.
    Nazarov, D. E.
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIYA, 2011, 51 (09) : 82 - 88
  • [48] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy When Is it Too Late?
    Tracy, Cynthia
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (01) : 47 - 49
  • [49] Unexpected implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Its characteristics and prognosis
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM O2, 2024, 5 (11): : 825 - 827
  • [50] The importance of myocardial contractile reserve in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kloosterman, Marielle
    Damman, Kevin
    Van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Maass, Alexander H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 (07) : 862 - 869