Can the Prognosis of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Be Predicted by Gated SPECT?

被引:1
作者
Qin, Shengmei [1 ]
Shi, Hongcheng [2 ]
Su, Yangang [1 ]
Chen, Shuguang [2 ]
Pan, Wenzhi [1 ]
Ge, Junbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MYOCARDIAL-PERFUSION SPECT; LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSSYNCHRONY; EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HEART-FAILURE; PHASE-ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; TISSUE; COLLABORATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000000912
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) phase parameters (phase SD and histogram bandwidth) in predicting the short-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as left ventricle (LV) remodeling and the long-term effect as all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation and hospitalization for heart failure. Patients and Methods This prospective observational study included 63 consecutive patients undergoing CRT from May 2008 to April 2014. Before CRT, patients underwent evaluation of New York Heart Association functional class, standard 12-lead ECG, Tc-99m-MIBI GMPS, and 2-dimensional echocardiography. The patients were grouped according to complete left bundle-branch block (CLBBB). Follow-up was done every 6 months after pacemaker implantation. The short-term end point was reverse LV remodeling in 6 to 12 months follow-up, and the long-term primary end point was all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation. The secondary end point was hospitalization for heart failure. Results Reverse LV remodeling showed in 60.9% (39/63) patients (74.5% CLBBB [35/47] vs 25.0% non-CLBBB [4/16], P < 0.001). Phase SD less than 55 degrees, CLBBB, and left atrium diameter were independent predictive factors for reverse LV remodeling. At a median follow-up of 39.76 months, there were 17 deaths and 2 transplantations (17.0% CLBBB vs 68.8% non-CLBBB, P < 0.001). Seventeen patients required hospitalization more than once for heart failure, and 2 underwent heart transplantation (14.9% CLBBB vs 62.5% non-CLBBB, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that only CLBBB was an independent predictive factor for both end points. Conclusions The GMPS parameters were not independent predictive factors for all-cause mortality or cardiac transplantation and hospitalization for heart failure.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 792
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Improving Non-Uniform Thickening of Left Ventricular Wall: Assessment by Quantitative Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
    Wakayama, Yuji
    Nakano, Makoto
    Fukuda, Koji
    Kumagai, Koji
    Sugai, Yoshinao
    Hirose, Masanori
    Yamaguchi, Nobuhiro
    Kondo, Masateru
    Kaneta, Tomohiro
    Fukuda, Hiroshi
    Kagaya, Yutaka
    Shimokawa, Hiroaki
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 251 (02) : 69 - 79
  • [32] The definition of left bundle branch block influences the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Caputo, Maria Luce
    van Stipdonk, Antonius
    Illner, Annekatrin
    D'Ambrosio, Gabriele
    Regoli, Francois
    Conte, Giulio
    Moccetti, Tiziano
    Klersy, Catherine
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Auricchio, Angelo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 269 : 165 - 169
  • [33] Does the presence of mitral regurgitation strengthen or weaken the indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Normand, Camilla
    Dickstein, Kenneth
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2016, 18 (08) : 1069 - 1071
  • [34] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy The Long and Short of It
    Sundaram, Varun
    Mackall, Judith A.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 8 (02) : 222 - 224
  • [35] Gated SPECT left ventricular shape and prediction of super responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Not so easy as it (LV) looks
    Altawil, Mahmoud
    Greenberg, Joshua
    Ananthasubramaniam, Karthik
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 1547 - 1551
  • [36] Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation
    Leyva, Francisco
    Zegard, Abbasin
    Patel, Peysh
    Stegemann, Berthold
    Marshall, Howard
    Ludman, Peter
    Walton, Jamie
    de Bono, Joseph
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Qiu, Tian
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (05):
  • [37] Cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Kass, DA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (09) : S35 - S41
  • [38] Imaging in the field of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a real additive value?
    Donal, Erwan
    Hernandez, Alfredo
    Hubert, Arnaud
    Galli, Elena
    Bernard, Anne
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (03) : 237 - 239
  • [39] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in the ageing population - With or without an implantable defibrillator?
    Doering, Michael
    Ebert, Micaela
    Dagres, Nikolaos
    Muessigbrodt, Andreas
    Bode, Kerstin
    Knopp, Helge
    Kuehl, Michael
    Hindricks, Gerhard
    Richter, Sergio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 263 : 48 - 53
  • [40] QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    ter Horst, Iris
    Kloosterman, Marielle
    Engels, Elien B.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
    Vos, Marc A.
    van Gelder, Isabelle C.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Meine, Mathias
    Maass, Alexander H.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 11 (12) : e006497