Denoising of PET images by combining wavelets and curvelets for improved preservation of resolution and quantitation

被引:63
作者
Le Pogam, A. [1 ]
Hanzouli, H. [1 ]
Hatt, M. [1 ]
Le Rest, C. Cheze [2 ]
Visvikis, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Brest, France
[2] CHU La Miletrie, Dept Nucl Med, Poitiers, France
关键词
Positron emission tomography; Curve let transform; Wavelet transform; Denoising; Filtering; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIRESOLUTION ANALYSIS; TRANSFORM; DECOMPOSITION; SHRINKAGE; RECONSTRUCTION; ALGORITHM; MODELS; DOMAIN; NOISE;
D O I
10.1016/j.media.2013.05.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Denoising of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images is a challenging task due to the inherent low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the acquired data. A pre-processing denoising step may facilitate and improve the results of further steps such as segmentation, quantification or textural features characterization. Different recent denoising techniques have been introduced and most state-of-the-art methods are based on filtering in the wavelet domain. However, the wavelet transform suffers from some limitations due to its non-optimal processing of edge discontinuities. More recently, a new multi scale geometric approach has been proposed, namely the curvelet transform. It extends the wavelet transform to account for directional properties in the image. In order to address the issue of resolution loss associated with standard denoising, we considered a strategy combining the complementary wavelet and curvelet transforms. We compared different figures of merit (e.g. SNR increase, noise decrease in homogeneous regions, resolution loss, and intensity bias) on simulated and clinical datasets with the proposed combined approach and the wavelet-only and curvelet-only filtering techniques. The three methods led to an increase of the SNR. Regarding the quantitative accuracy however, the wavelet and curvelet only denoising approaches led to larger biases in the intensity and the contrast than the proposed combined algorithm. This approach could become an alternative solution to filters currently used after image reconstruction in clinical systems such as the Gaussian filter. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 891
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Chen SSB, 2001, SIAM REV, V43, P129, DOI [10.1137/S003614450037906X, 10.1137/S1064827596304010]
[12]  
Chua S., 2011, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I
[13]   Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models [J].
Crouse, MS ;
Nowak, RD ;
Baraniuk, RG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1998, 46 (04) :886-902
[14]   DE-NOISING BY SOFT-THRESHOLDING [J].
DONOHO, DL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1995, 41 (03) :613-627
[15]   IDEAL SPATIAL ADAPTATION BY WAVELET SHRINKAGE [J].
DONOHO, DL ;
JOHNSTONE, IM .
BIOMETRIKA, 1994, 81 (03) :425-455
[16]   Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage [J].
Donoho, DL ;
Johnstone, IM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (432) :1200-1224
[17]  
Dutilleux P., 1987, Wavelets: Time-Frequency Methods andPhase-Space, P298
[18]   Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform [J].
Easley, Glenn ;
Labate, Demetrio ;
Lim, Wang-Q .
APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL HARMONIC ANALYSIS, 2008, 25 (01) :25-46
[19]   A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PET [J].
Hatt, Mathieu ;
le Rest, Catherine Cheze ;
Turzo, Alexandre ;
Roux, Christian ;
Visvikis, Dimitris .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2009, 28 (06) :881-893
[20]   3-D discrete analytical Ridgelet transform [J].
Helbert, David ;
Carre, Philippe ;
Andres, Eric .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2006, 15 (12) :3701-3714