Seismic fragility analysis of large unanchored steel tanks considering local instability and fatigue damage

被引:25
作者
Cortes, G. [1 ]
Prinz, G. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] LeTourneau Univ, Longview, TX USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Civil Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Unanchored steel tanks; Fragility curves; Dynamic analysis; Fatigue; Shell buckling; BASE-UPLIFTING ANALYSIS; BEAM MODEL; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-016-9984-6
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
When unanchored steel liquid storage tanks are subjected to strong ground motions, the contained liquid may cause uplift of the tank base resulting in compressive buckling of the tank shell and or ultra low-cycle fatigue (ULCF) damage to the shell-to-base welded connections. This paper presents a method for investigating the shell buckling and connection ULCF vulnerability for unanchored steel tank geometries using simplified mass-spring models and incremental dynamic analysis. The presented simplified mass-spring models simulate resistance to local base uplift, tank rocking, and provide equilibrium-based approaches for determining tank shell compressive forces resulting from dynamic earthquake loadings. In this study, four existing tanks (considering both broad and slender geometries) are analyzed under 20 recorded ground motions, scaled at 30 different levels (from 0.05 to 1.5 g) for a total of 2400 dynamic analyses. Results from the incremental dynamic analyses are used to create fragility curves, wherein shell buckling and connection ULCF probabilities are related to the level of seismic excitation. Results from the analyses on the four existing tank geometries highlight shell buckling vulnerabilities for both broad and slender tank geometries under moderate seismic excitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1295
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The tapered beam model for bottom plate uplift analysis of unanchored cylindrical steel storage tanks [J].
Ahari, Masoud Nourali ;
Eshghi, Sassan ;
Ashtiany, Mohsen Ghafory .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (03) :623-632
[2]  
American Lifelines Alliance (Ala), 2001, Seismic Fragility Formulation for Water Systems, Part 1-Guidelines
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 19981 EC81 ENV EUR C
[4]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[5]   EARTHQUAKE SIMULATOR STUDIES OF CYLINDRICAL TANKS [J].
CLOUGH, DP ;
CLOUGH, RW .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1978, 46 (02) :367-380
[6]  
Clough DP, 1977, 7710 EERC
[7]  
Clough RN, 1979, 7906 EERC
[8]  
Comite Europeen de Normalisation, 2006, 19984 CEN EN
[9]  
Cortes G, 2010, 4951 IC EPFL
[10]  
FEMA H., 2003, Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model