Grassroots Resistance to Digital Platforms and Relational Business Model Design to Overcome It: A Conceptual Framework

被引:38
作者
Ricart, Joan Enric [1 ]
Snihur, Yuliya [2 ]
Carrasco-Farre, Carlos [3 ]
Berrone, Pascual [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, IESE Business Sch, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Toulouse Business Sch, F-31068 Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Ramon Llull, ESADE Business Sch, Sant Cugat Del Valles 08172, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra, IESE Business Sch, Madrid 28023, Spain
关键词
digital platforms; grassroots collective action; multisidedness; stakeholder value proposition; ecosystem-centered governance; relational business model design; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; SHARING ECONOMY; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; VALUE CREATION; INNOVATION; STRATEGIES; ECOSYSTEM;
D O I
10.1287/stsc.2020.0104
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Although extant research has studied incumbent resistance to digital platforms, it provides little understanding about when grassroots collective action by other ecosystem stakeholders against the digital platform is likely. In this paper, we identify the scope conditions detailing when local stakeholders can initiate grassroots collective action against the digital platform, a unique context characterized by fast growth, distributed innovation, role flexibility, and direct local connectivity, and propose viable solutions. Our conceptual framework suggests that grassroots collective action against the digital platform is most likely when the digital platform operates with localized scarce assets or localized precarious labor and when actors express their grievances through formalized channels. We combine business model design and stakeholder management perspectives to develop design-based solutions that involve a multisided business model structure, an inclusive stakeholder value proposition, and an ecosystem-centered governance. We call the combination of such design efforts relational business model design. To the incipient theory of digital platforms, we contribute a stakeholder-centered view of platform business models operating within local ecosystems, bridging research on collective action and stakeholder management with strategic management of platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 291
页数:21
相关论文
共 153 条
[61]   Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java']Java [J].
Garud, R ;
Jain, S ;
Kumaraswamy, A .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (01) :196-214
[62]  
Gassmann O., 2014, The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models that Will Revolutionise your Business
[63]  
Gawer A, 2007, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V16, P1
[64]   Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework [J].
Gawer, Annabelle .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (07) :1239-1249
[65]   Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation [J].
Gawer, Annabelle ;
Cusumano, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (03) :417-433
[66]   Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel's Transformation to Platform Leader [J].
Gawer, Annabelle ;
Phillips, Nelson .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2013, 34 (08) :1035-1071
[67]   A space for place in sociology [J].
Gieryn, TF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 :463-496
[68]   ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN REGULATED MARKETS: FRAMING CONTESTS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION TO INTRODUCE PAY TV IN THE US [J].
Gurses, Kerem ;
Ozcan, Pinar .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 58 (06) :1709-1739
[69]   Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms [J].
Hagiu, Andrei .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) :720-737
[70]   First-Party Content and Coordination in Two-Sided Markets [J].
Hagiu, Andrei ;
Spulber, Daniel .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (04) :933-949