Market-Based Instruments for Ecosystem Services: Institutional Innovation or Renovation?

被引:57
作者
Boisvert, Valerie [1 ]
Meral, Philippe [2 ]
Froger, Geraldine [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Inst Geog & Durabilite, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] UMR GRED IRD UPV Montpellier 3, IRD, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Versailles St Quentin Yvelines, CEMOTEV, Guyancourt, France
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
biodiversity offsets; economic incentives; ecosystem services; institutional arrangements; market-based instruments; payments for environmental services; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; PAYMENTS; COMMODIFICATION; VALUATION; ECONOMICS; BANKING;
D O I
10.1080/08941920.2013.820815
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen widespread experimentation with market-based instruments (MBIs) for the provision of environmental goods and ecosystem services. However, little attention has been paid to their design or to the effects of the underlying pro-market narrative on environmental policy instruments. The purpose of this article is to analyze the emergence and dissemination of the term market-based instruments applied to the provision of environmental services and to assess to what extent the instruments associated are genuinely innovative. The recommendation to develop markets can lead in practice to a variety of institutional forms, as we show it based on the example of payments for environmental services (PES) and biodiversity offsets, two very different mechanisms that are both presented in the literature as MBIs. Our purpose is to highlight the gap between discourse and practice in connection with MBIs.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1136
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PAYMENTS ECOSYSTEM S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[3]   Nature™ Inc.: Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market-based Environmental Policy [J].
Arsel, Murat ;
Buscher, Bram .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2012, 43 (01) :53-78
[4]   Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? [J].
Balmford, A ;
Whitten, T .
ORYX, 2003, 37 (02) :238-250
[5]  
Baumol W.J., 1979, EC ENV POLICY QUALIT
[6]  
Boisvert V., 2012, ECON APPL, V65, P107
[7]   Ecosystem services and fictitious commodities [J].
Brockington, Dan .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (04) :367-369
[8]   BioBanking: an environmental scientist's view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation [J].
Burgin, Shelley .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (04) :807-816
[9]   'Mitigation banks' for wetland conservation: a major success or an unmitigated disaster? [J].
Burgin, Shelley .
WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 18 (01) :49-55
[10]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260