Accuracy of End-tidal CO2 Measurement Through the Nose and Pharynx in Nonintubated Patients During Digital Subtraction Cerebral Angiography

被引:11
作者
Zhang, Chunyan [1 ]
Wang, Maohua [1 ]
Wang, Rurong [1 ]
Wang, Wenjian [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Peoples Hosp Henan Prov, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
end-tidal CO2; accuracy; spontaneously breathing; Smart CapnoLine; digital subtraction angiography; non-intubated anesthesia; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; RESPIRATORY EVENTS; OBESE-PATIENTS; CAPNOGRAPHY; ANESTHESIA; CAPNOMETRY; ANALGESIA; PCO2;
D O I
10.1097/ANA.0b013e31827c9d5a
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the accuracy of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) obtained in the nose through the Smart CapnoLine and in the pharynx through the modified Filterline H Set with supplemental oxygen at 5 L/min in nonintubated patients undergoing digital subtraction cerebral angiography (DSA). Type of Study: Prospective, observational. Patients: Twenty patients with disturbance of consciousness because of brain disease, who will receive DSA. Methods: PETCO2 was measured in the nose through the Smart CapnoLine and in the pharynx using the modified Filterline H Set that was inserted through the nasopharyngeal airway. Oxygen was administered through the Smart CapnoLine at a rate of 5 L/min. Five minutes after a constant and normally shaped capnography waveform, arterial blood was drawn from an indwelling femoral catheter for analyzing arterial CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2), and PETCO2 that was measured through the nose and the pharynx were simultaneously recorded. After the DSA procedure, PaCO2 was analyzed again. Data were analyzed with Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: PETCO2 sampled from both the nose and the pharynx was significantly correlated with PaCO2, and the correlation coefficients had approximate values, 0.832 (P < 0.0001) for PaCO2 with PETCO2 through the nose and 0.836 (P < 0.0001) for PaCO2 with PETCO2 through the pharynx. The mean bias +/- SD for PETCO2 and PaCO2 was 4.53 +/- 2.76 mm Hg (nose) and 3.22 +/- 2.86 mm Hg (pharynx). The 95% level of agreement for PETCO2 and PaCO2 ranged from -0.90 to 9.95 mm Hg (nose) and from -2.39 to 8.82 mm Hg (pharynx). End-tidal CO2 measurements through the nose and the pharynx had comparable performance. The correlation of PETCO2 measured through the nose and the pharynx was 0.971 (P < 0.001). The difference between PETCO2 measured through the nose and the pharynx was 1.31 +/- 1.25 mm Hg, and t test results showed that arterial to end-tidal CO2 pressure difference (Pa-ETCO2) in sampling through the nose was significantly greater than Pa-ETCO2 sampling through the pharynx (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In a clinical setting, end-tidal CO2 measurements sampled from the nose and the pharynx were accurate and reliable in nonintubated patients with a nasopharynx airway in place during DSA.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 196
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The use of capnometry to predict arterial partial pressure of CO 2in non-intubated breathless patients in the emergency department [J].
Nik Ab Rahman N.H. ;
Mamat A.F. .
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010, 3 (4) :315-320
[2]   Noninvasive capnometry monitoring for respiratory status during pediatric seizures [J].
Abramo, TJ ;
Wiebe, RA ;
Scott, S ;
Goto, CS ;
McIntire, DD .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (07) :1242-1246
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Does end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring detect respiratory events prior to current sedation monitoring practices? [J].
Burton, JH ;
Harrah, JD ;
Germann, CA ;
Dillon, DC .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (05) :500-504
[5]  
Cacho G, 2010, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V102, P86, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082010000200003
[6]  
Chudnofsky CR, 2006, ROSENS EMERGENCY MED, P2938
[7]   Does End Tidal CO2 Monitoring During Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia With Propofol Decrease the Incidence of Hypoxic Events? A Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Deitch, Kenneth ;
Miner, Jim ;
Chudnofsky, Carl R. ;
Dominici, Paul ;
Latta, Daniel .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 55 (03) :258-264
[8]   Standardizing care and monitoring for anesthesia or procedural sedation delivered outside the operating room [J].
Eichhorn, Volker ;
Henzler, Dietrich ;
Murphy, Michael F. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 23 (04) :494-499
[9]   DEADSPACE AND THE SINGLE BREATH TEST FOR CARBON-DIOXIDE DURING ANESTHESIA AND ARTIFICIAL-VENTILATION [J].
FLETCHER, R ;
JONSON, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 56 (02) :109-119
[10]  
Gravenstein N, 1985, J Clin Monit, V1, P6, DOI 10.1007/BF02832683