Changing doctor prescribing behaviour

被引:37
作者
Gill, PS [1 ]
Mäkelä, M
Vermeulen, KM
Freemantle, N
Ryan, G
Bond, C
Thorsen, T
Haaijer-Ruskamp, FM
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Primary Care & Gen Practice, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Natl Res & Dev Ctr Welf & Hlth, Serv & Qual Stakes, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Groningen, No Ctr Hlth Care Res, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Groningen Utrecht Inst Drug Explorat, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[6] Mercer So Sch Pharm, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Gen Practice, Aberdeen AB9 1FX, Scotland
[8] Danish Inst Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE | 1999年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
control groups; intervals; interventions;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008719129305
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The aim of this overview was to identify interventions that change doctor prescribing behaviour and to derive conclusions for practice and further research. Relevant studies (indicating prescribing as a behaviour change) were located from a database of studies maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. This register is kept up to date by searching the following databases for reports of relevant research: DHSS-DATA; EMBASE; MEDLINE; SIGLE; Resource Database in Continuing Medical Education (1975-1994), along with bibliographies of related topics, hand searching of key journals and personal contact with content area experts. Randomised controlled trials and non-equivalent group designs with pre- and post-intervention measures were included. Outcome measures were those used by the study authors. For each study we determined whether these were positive, negative or inconclusive. Positive studies (+) were those that demonstrated a statistically significant change in the majority of outcomes measured at level of p less than or equal to 0.05 between the intervention and control groups. Negative studies (-) showed a significant change in the opposite direction and inconclusive studies (approximate to) showed no significant change compared to control or no overall positive findings. We identified 79eligible studies which described 96 separate interventions to change prescribing behaviour. Of these interventions, 49 (51%, 41%-61%) showed a positive significant change compared to the control group but interpretation of specific interventions is limited due to wide and overlapping confidence intervals.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 161 条
[51]  
GULLION DS, 1988, J CONTIN EDUC HEALTH, V8, P239
[52]   REDUCING THE USE OF H-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS IN THE LONG-TERM-CARE SETTING [J].
GURWITZ, JH ;
NOONAN, JP ;
SOUMERAI, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1992, 40 (04) :359-364
[53]   CHANGING PHYSICIAN PRESCRIBING PATTERNS - EVALUATION OF AN EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY FOR ACUTE DIARRHEA IN MEXICO-CITY [J].
GUTIERREZ, G ;
GUISCAFRE, H ;
BRONFMAN, M ;
WALSH, J ;
MARTINEZ, H ;
MUNOZ, O .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (05) :436-446
[54]   THE EFFECT OF DRUG CO-PAYMENTS ON UTILIZATION AND COST OF PHARMACEUTICALS IN A HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION [J].
HARRIS, BL ;
STERGACHIS, A ;
RIED, LD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (10) :907-917
[55]  
Hastings J E, 1973, Med Care, V11, P91, DOI 10.1097/00005650-197303000-00002
[56]   CLINICAL PHARMACY FUNCTIONS IN AMBULATORY PATIENT-CARE [J].
HAWKINS, DW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 21 (5-6) :245-250
[57]  
HEDGES LV, 1985, TATISTICAL METHODS M
[58]  
HEDRICK SC, 1993, MED CARE, V31, pSS3
[59]   IMPROVING COMPLIANCE WITH IMMUNIZATION IN THE OLDER ADULT - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED COHORT STUDY [J].
HERMAN, CJ ;
SPEROFF, T ;
CEBUL, RD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1994, 42 (11) :1154-1159
[60]   INFLUENCE OF SIMPLE COMPUTERIZED FEEDBACK ON PRESCRIPTION CHARGES IN AN AMBULATORY CLINIC - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
HERSHEY, CO ;
PORTER, DK ;
BRESLAU, D ;
COHEN, DI .
MEDICAL CARE, 1986, 24 (06) :472-481