Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves

被引:234
作者
Arends, L. R. [1 ,2 ]
Hamza, T. H. [1 ]
van Houwelingen, J. C. [3 ]
Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H. [1 ,4 ]
Hunink, M. G. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Stijnen, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
metaanalysis; diagnostic tests; multivariate random effects models; sensitivity; specificity; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X08319957
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Meta-analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve data is often done with fixed-effects models, which suffer many shortcomings. Some random-effects models have been proposed to execute a meta-analysis of ROC-curve data, but these models are not often used in practice. Straightforward modeling techniques for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis of ROC-curve data are needed. The 1st aim of this article is to present a practical method that addresses the drawbacks of the fixed-effects summary ROC (SROC) method of Littenberg and Moses. Sensitivities and specificities are analyzed simultaneously using a bivariate random-effects model. The 2nd aim is to show that other SROC curves can also be derived from the bivariate model through different characterizations of the estimated bivariate normal distribution. Thereby the authors show that the bivariate random-effects approach not only extends the SROC approach but also provides a unifying framework for other approaches. The authors bring the statistical meta-analysis of ROC-curve data back into a framework of relatively standard multivariate meta-analysis with random effects. The analyses were carried out using the software package SAS (Proc NLMIXED).
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 638
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL
  • [2] Combining multiple outcome measures in a meta-analysis:: an application
    Arends, LR
    Vokó, Z
    Stijnen, T
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (08) : 1335 - 1353
  • [3] Arends LR, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3497, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3497::AID-SIM830>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-H
  • [5] Berkey CS, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2537, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981130)17:22<2537::AID-SIM953>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-C
  • [7] Carroll RJ., 1995, MEASUREMENT ERROR NO
  • [8] Meta-analysis of binary data: which within study variance estimate to use?
    Chang, BH
    Waternaux, C
    Lipsitz, S
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (13) : 1947 - 1956
  • [9] *COMM HAPP, 1985, ANN INTERN MED, V103, P147
  • [10] Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening
    Deeks, JJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305): : 157 - 162