Microbiota of bovine milk, teat skin, and teat canal: Similarity and variation due to sampling technique and milk fraction

被引:12
作者
Dahlberg, J. [1 ]
Williams, J. E. [2 ]
McGuire, M. A. [2 ]
Peterson, H. K. [2 ]
Ostensson, K. [3 ]
Agenas, S. [1 ]
Dicksved, J. [1 ]
Waller, K. Persson [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Nutr & Management, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Anim & Vet Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Clin Sci, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Natl Vet Inst, Dept Anim Hlth & Antimicrobial Strategies, S-75189 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
milk microbiota; milk sampling technique; cannula; 16S rRNA; CONTAMINATION; POPULATIONS; BACTERIA; MASTITIS; DAIRY; DNA;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2019-17783
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sampling technique and milk fraction on bovine milk microbiota data and to compare the microbiota in milk to microbiota on the teat end and in the teat canal. Representative milk samples are highly important for assessment of bacteriological findings and microbiota in milk. Samples were obtained from 5 healthy lactating dairy cows at udder quarter level during 1 milking. Swab samples from the teat. end and teat canal, and milk samples collected using different techniques and in different milk fractions were included. Milk was collected by hand stripping and through a teat canal cannula before and after machine milking, through a trans-teat wall needle aspirate after milking, and from udder quarter composite milk. The microbiota of the samples was analyzed with sequencing of the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. In addition, somatic cell counts and bacterial cultivability were analyzed in the milk samples. Microbiota data were analyzed using multivariate methods, and differences between samples were tested using analysis of similarity (ANOSIM). Differences between samples were further explored via individual studies of the 10 most abundant genera. The microbiota on the teat end, in the teat canal, and in udder quarter composite milk, collected using a milking machine, differed in composition from the microbiota in milk collected directly from the udder quarter. No differences in milk microbiota composition were detected between hand-stripped milk samples, milk samples taken through a teat canal cannula, or milk samples taken as a trans-teat wall needle aspirate before or after milking. We conclude that for aseptic milk samples collected directly from the lactating udder quarter, sampling technique or milk fraction has minor effect on the microbiota composition.
引用
收藏
页码:7322 / 7330
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Observed reduction in recovery of Corynebacterium spp. from bovine milk samples by use of a teat cannula [J].
Bexiga, Ricardo ;
Pereira, Helena ;
Pereira, Octavio ;
Leitao, Andre ;
Carneiro, Carla ;
Ellis, Kathryn A. ;
Vilela, Cristina L. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2011, 78 (01) :9-14
[2]   Culture-independent exploration of the teat apex microbiota of dairy cows reveals a wide bacterial species diversity [J].
Braem, Gorik ;
De Vliegher, Sarne ;
Verbist, Bert ;
Heyndrickx, Marc ;
Leroy, Frederic ;
De Vuyst, Luc .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 157 (3-4) :383-390
[3]   Stability of microbial communities in goat milk during a lactation year: Molecular approaches [J].
Callon, Cecile ;
Duthoit, Frederique ;
Delbes, Celine ;
Ferrand, Marion ;
Le Frileux, Yves ;
De Cremoux, Rene ;
Montel, Marie-Christine .
SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 30 (07) :547-560
[4]   Fecal Microbial Community Structure Is Stable over Time and Related to Variation in Macronutrient and Micronutrient Intakes in Lactating Women [J].
Carrothers, Janae M. ;
York, Mara A. ;
Brooker, Sarah L. ;
Lackey, Kimberly A. ;
Williams, Janet E. ;
Shafii, Bahman ;
Price, William J. ;
Settles, Matthew L. ;
McGuire, Mark A. ;
McGuire, Michelle K. .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2015, 145 (10) :2379-2388
[5]   NONPARAMETRIC MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES OF CHANGES IN COMMUNITY STRUCTURE [J].
CLARKE, KR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1993, 18 (01) :117-143
[6]  
Conly J, 1996, Can J Infect Dis, V7, P99
[7]   Microbiota data from low biomass milk samples is markedly affected by laboratory and reagent contamination [J].
Dahlberg, Josef ;
Sun, Li ;
Waller, Karin Persson ;
Ostensson, Karin ;
McGuire, Mark ;
Agenas, Sigrid ;
Dicksved, Johan .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06)
[8]   Composition of the teat canal and intramammary microbiota of dairy cows subjected to antimicrobial dry cow therapy and internal teat sealant [J].
Derakhshani, Hooman ;
Plaizier, Jan C. ;
De Buck, Jeroen ;
Barkema, Herman W. ;
Khafipour, Ehsan .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (11) :10191-10205
[9]  
Doyle CJ, 2017, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V83, DOI [10.1128/AEM.02694-16, 10.1128/aem.02694-16]
[10]   Contamination routes of Gram-negative spoilage bacteria in the production of pasteurised milk, evaluated by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [J].
Eneroth, Å ;
Ahrné, S ;
Molin, G .
INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2000, 10 (5-6) :325-331