Welfare costs and benefits of non-tariff measures in trade: a conceptual framework and application

被引:40
作者
Beghin, John [1 ,2 ]
Disdier, Anne-Celia [3 ]
Marette, Stephan [2 ]
Van Tongeren, Frank [4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] AgroParisTech, INRA, UMR Econ Publ, Paris, France
[3] Paris Sch Econ, INRA UMR PSE, Paris, France
[4] OECD, Trade & Agr Directorate, Paris, France
关键词
AGRI-FOOD TRADE; STANDARDS; REGULATIONS; IMPACT; RISK; HARMONIZATION; BARRIERS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1017/S1474745612000201
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides a systematic welfare-based approach to analyze the impact of non-tariff measures (NTMs) on trade and welfare in the presence of market imperfections. It focuses on standard-like measures such as technical barriers and sanitary and phytosanitary regulations. The approach overcomes the shortcomings of the mainstream approach based on the analysis of foregone trade caused by trade costs. The latter ignores market imperfections, and welfare is found to increases when NTMs are reduced and trade expands. We explain how to account for external effects and market failures in trade-focused welfare analysis, leading to a more balanced overall assessment of measures despite a potential reduction of trade flows. The relationships between trade, welfare, and NTMs are complex, and generalizations are best avoided. Very often, the optimum NTM is not the absence of regulation. An application to shrimp trade illustrates the feasibility of the proposed approach. The illustration shows that the reinforcement of a food safety standard can be socially preferable to the status-quo situation, both domestically and internationally.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 375
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FISHSTAT PLUS UN SOF
[2]   No such thing as a free safe lunch: The cost of food safety regulation in the meat industry [J].
Antle, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (02) :310-322
[3]  
Asche F., 2001, DEMAND ELASTIC UNPUB
[4]   Non-tariff trade barriers and consumers' information: The case of the EU-US trade dispute over beef [J].
Bureau, JC ;
Marette, S ;
Schiavina, A .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 25 (04) :437-462
[5]  
CHICHILNISKY G, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P851
[6]   Help or Hindrance? The Impact of Harmonised Standards on African Exports [J].
Czubala, Witold ;
Shepherd, Ben ;
Wilson, John S. .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2009, 18 (05) :711-744
[7]   Harmonisation of food regulations and trade in the Single Market: evidence from disaggregated data [J].
de Frahan, Bruno Henry ;
Vancauteren, Mark .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 33 (03) :337-360
[8]   Small fish-big issues: the effect of trade policy on the global shrimp market [J].
Debaere, Peter .
WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2010, 9 (02) :353-374
[9]  
DEY MM, 2004, IIFET M TOK 21 30 JU
[10]   The impact of regulations on agricultural trade:: Evidence from the SPS and TBT agreements [J].
Disdier, Anne-Celia ;
Fontagne, Lionel ;
Mimouni, Mondher .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (02) :336-350