Analyzing the advantages of subcutaneous over transcutaneous electrical stimulation for activating brainwaves

被引:10
作者
Kang, Wonok [1 ]
Lee, Jiho [2 ]
Kim, Yu Ri [2 ]
Chung, Woo Ram [3 ]
Na, Duk L. [3 ]
Shon, Young-Min [3 ]
Park, Sung-Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Interdisciplinary Biosci & Bioengn, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[2] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Creat IT Engn, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Neurol, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Seoul 06351, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
DIELECTRIC-PROPERTIES; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; SECTIONED IMAGES; MOTOR CORTEX; MODELS; SAFETY; OSCILLATIONS; EPILEPSY; SKULL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-64378-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a widely accepted neuromodulation modality for treating brain disorders. However, its clinical efficacy is fundamentally limited due to the current shunting effect of the scalp and safety issues. A newer electrical stimulation technique called subcutaneous electrical stimulation (SES) promises to overcome the limitations of TES by applying currents directly at the site of the disorder through the skull. While SES seems promising, the electrophysiological effect of SES compared to TES is still unknown, thus limiting its broader application. Here we comprehensively analyze the SES and TES to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of SES. Beagles were bilaterally implanted with subdural strips for intracranial electroencephalography and electric field recording. For the intracerebral electric field prediction, we designed a 3D electromagnetic simulation framework and simulated TES and SES. In the beagle model, SES induces three to four-fold larger cerebral electric fields compared to TES, and significant changes in power ratio of brainwaves were observed only in SES. Our prediction framework suggests that the field penetration of SES would be several-fold larger than TES in human brains. These results demonstrate that the SES would significantly enhance the neuromodulatory effects compared to conventional TES and overcome the TES limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Dexmedetomidine-Induced Electroencephalogram Oscillations
    Akeju, Oluwaseun
    Kim, Seong-Eun
    Vazquez, Rafael
    Rhee, James
    Pavone, Kara J.
    Hobbs, Lauren E.
    Purdon, Patrick L.
    Brown, Emery N.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [2] Conductivities of three-layer live human skull
    Akhtari, M
    Bryant, HC
    Marnelak, AN
    Flynn, ER
    Heller, L
    Shih, JJ
    Mandelkern, M
    Matlachov, A
    Ranken, DM
    Best, ED
    DiMauro, MA
    Lee, RR
    Sutherling, WW
    [J]. BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2002, 14 (03) : 151 - 167
  • [3] Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance
    Ali, Mohsin M.
    Sellers, Kristin K.
    Frohlich, Flavio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (27) : 11262 - 11275
  • [4] Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines
    Antal, A.
    Alekseichuk, I.
    Bikson, M.
    Brockmoeller, J.
    Brunoni, A. R.
    Chen, R.
    Cohen, L. G.
    Dowthwaite, G.
    Ellrich, J.
    Floeel, A.
    Fregni, F.
    George, M. S.
    Hamilton, R.
    Haueisen, J.
    Herrmann, C. S.
    Hummel, F. C.
    Lefaucheur, J. P.
    Liebetanz, D.
    Loo, C. K.
    McCaig, C. D.
    Miniussi, C.
    Miranda, P. C.
    Moliadze, V.
    Nitsche, M. A.
    Nowak, R.
    Padberg, F.
    Pascual-Leone, A.
    Poppendieck, W.
    Priori, A.
    Rossi, S.
    Rossini, P. M.
    Rothwell, J.
    Rueger, M. A.
    Ruffini, G.
    Schellhorn, K.
    Siebner, H. R.
    Ugawa, Y.
    Wexler, A.
    Ziemann, U.
    Hallett, M.
    Paulus, W.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (09) : 1774 - 1809
  • [5] Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
    Antal, Andrea
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [6] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Childhood Focal Epilepsy
    Auvichayapat, Narong
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    Gersner, Roman
    Ngodklang, Sudarat
    Tiamkao, Somsak
    Tassaneeyakul, Wichittra
    Auvichayapat, Paradee
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) : 696 - 700
  • [7] Using Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Treat Stroke Patients With Aphasia
    Baker, Julie M.
    Rorden, Chris
    Fridriksson, Julius
    [J]. STROKE, 2010, 41 (06) : 1229 - 1236
  • [8] Closed-Loop Control of Epilepsy by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
    Berenyi, Antal
    Belluscio, Mariano
    Mao, Dun
    Buzsaki, Gyoergy
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 337 (6095) : 735 - 737
  • [9] Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016
    Bikson, Marom
    Grossman, Pnina
    Thomas, Chris
    Zannou, Adantchede Louis
    Jiang, Jimmy
    Adnan, Tatheer
    Mourdoukoutas, Antonios P.
    Kronberg, Greg
    Truong, Dennis
    Boggio, Paulo
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Charvet, Leigh
    Fregni, Felipe
    Fritsch, Brita
    Gillick, Bernadette
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Hampstead, Benjamin M.
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kirton, Adam
    Knotkova, Helena
    Liebetanz, David
    Liu, Anli
    Loo, Colleen
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reis, Janine
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    Woods, Adam J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 641 - 661
  • [10] High-Resolution Modeling Assisted Design of Customized and Individualized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Protocols
    Bikson, Marom
    Rahman, Asif
    Datta, Abhishek
    Fregni, Felipe
    Merabet, Lotfi
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2012, 15 (04): : 306 - 315